David Boutflour WS's.

[ILB]

Have to treat anything DB says with caution.

He disliked Jeremy Bamber and was ultimately a beneficiary

[Adam]

Oh I hear its getting to you, but remember, however galling it may be, we can't change others' behaviours. We can only change our own.........and it starts with taking a few deep breaths to calm ourselves.

Seems that Roch stopped me creating threads because one poster doesn't like them - Baby Mike.

Obviously that will never happen again.

[Adam]

Have to treat anything DB says with caution.

He disliked Jeremy Bamber and was ultimately a beneficiary

What do you think is incorrect in his WS?

[ILB]

What do you think is incorrect in his WS?

Which one, there are five?

[Adam]

Which one, there are five?

Any of them. Or the points in the thread.

[Roch]

Seems that Roch stopped me creating threads because one poster doesn't like them - Baby Mike.

Obviously that will never happen again.

The poster you are referring to didn't complain about you creating threads.  You had temporary restrictions placed upon you. Since those restrictions began, there was an initial quiet period, which then led to the forum flourishing, with lots of debates and activity, including some your own posts. You are welcome to post on here providing you are not just playing a game for your own amusement, which fouls up the forum with hundreds of threads.

[Adam]

The poster you are referring to didn't complain about you creating threads.  You had temporary restrictions placed upon you. Since those restrictions began, there was an initial quiet period, which then led to the forum flourishing, with lots of debates and activity, including some your own posts. You are welcome to post on here providing you are not just playing a game for your own amusement, which fouls up the forum with hundreds of threads.

Please do not lie Roch.

The poster said in reply 11 he complained about me creating threads on the case. He is a supporter.

No one else will have complained.

I will clarify the situation in the disclaimer section.

[Roch]

Please do not lie Roch.

The poster said in reply 11 he complained about me creating threads on the case. He is a supporter.

No one else will have complained.

I will clarify the situation in the disclaimer section.

I only recall the poster complaining about inaccurate information on the 'stolen bike' thread.  The forum flourished after you were prevented from creating multiple threads. Why don't you conduct a poll regarding whether members want to return to you creating multiple threads?

[Adam]

Roch can you tell BuboBubo not to call me a hippo. Which he did in his first reply in this thread.

Thank you.

[Jane]

I only recall the poster complaining about inaccurate information on the 'stolen bike' thread.  The forum flourished after you were prevented from creating multiple threads. Why don't you conduct a poll regarding whether members want to return to you creating multiple threads?

This is not aggression. I am merely repeating for the umpteenth time my dislike of his posting style

This sounds in danger of becoming like a certain bank which closed someone's account because he, allegedly, didn't share their values.

Personally, I dislike lengthy posts. It's my problem, not the posters. The answer is perfectly clear. I don't read them.

[Adam]

I only recall the poster complaining about inaccurate information on the 'stolen bike' thread.  The forum flourished after you were prevented from creating multiple threads. Why don't you conduct a poll regarding whether members want to return to you creating multiple threads?

No new members. No returning members.

BuboBubo did start creating threads on his made up crime scene. You obviously prefer those threads.

[Roch]

Roch can you tell BuboBubo not to call me a hippo. Which he did in his first reply in this thread.

Thank you.

Can all members please refrain from using personally insulting terms that label other members. Thank you in advance of cooperation.

[Roch]

No new members. No returning members.

BuboBubo did start creating threads on his made up crime scene. You obviously prefer those threads.

After an initial quiet period following on from your restrictions, debate on the forum picked up and flourished. You are entitled to hold a different opinion. 

I hope someone has reached you by pm.

[Adam]

This sounds in danger of becoming like a certain bank which closed someone's account because he, allegedly, didn't share their values.

Personally, I dislike lengthy posts. It's my problem, not the posters. The answer is perfectly clear. I don't read them.

I have only created 2 threads today. After 30 days of no threads. Not sure why there is such a panic!

The issue of the scratch on the silencer has never been discussed before to my knowledge.

So worthy of a thread.

[Roch]

I have only created 2 threads today. After 30 days of no threads. Not sure why there is such a panic!

The issue of the scratch on the silencer has never been discussed before to my knowledge.

So worthy of a thread.

There is no panic.