Ballistics manipulation

[Zoso]

The problem for those who believe JB guilty is that for years the only real evidence against him has been the SM and the testimony of a jilted lover who is a proven liar and a fraud. The SM has been undone by many including myself, there was always 2 and it was the main plank of the prosecution case.
Overtime the remaining circumstantial evidence like bike rides on sea walls and windows has been chipped away. They are seen for what they are just stories made up to cast JB as ruthless money seeking killer.

They are now reduced to 'over the garden fence' tittle tattle and gossip with no evidential purpose.
He said this which means this. He did that which means this. It is all about how they know what people were thinking. Many of them act as if they are mind readers. On and on it goes, reheating the same old tropes and bad mouthing JB.

As soon as anyone dares to suggest innocence and puts forward a contradictory point they are verbally savaged. Look what has happened to Bill Robertson for example. They do not try to dismantle or challenge the idea/theory they hunt in a pack to beat down sensible suggestions that have some value without thought or reason. They behave as if innocence belief is the work of the devil and requires the protagonists be put in the stocks or burned at the stake. They need to be put in a straight jacket and locked in a padded room.

Their lack of intellectual rigor is astounding. Just watch over the next few days as they snipe and sneer without any real evidence to support what they say.

They are lost in a dark cynical world where they are totally right in their beliefs and everyone else is a heretic.

When were you 'savaged'?

[David1819]

There are over 200 pieces of evidence. Eighty of it forensic. All sourced. Posted before.

But appreciate supporters will try to round it down.

Julie's WS & testimony was also comprehensive.

Your forensics is now eighty pieces of bullshit? This time last year you had only made up 75?

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10866.msg521571.html#msg521571

[Adam]

Your forensics is now eighty pieces of bullshit? This time last year you had only made up 75?

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10866.msg521571.html#msg521571

And I have found more.

People involved in the case will have more.

Sorry David.

[snow66!]

Its not a fact. And I don't believe it either.

Do you think it was the rifle barrel Dave? What was the purpose of someone intentionally burning Nevills back?

[Bubo bubo]

When were you 'savaged'?

On this thread Steve made the age comment David accused me of taking drugs and Jane made a contribution that did not address the issue but was more like a health and safety talk on Aga's .Adam has been told off for calling me mad. Jane thinks agreeing with one thing MT says undermines my argument. Just check their posts. It is all par for the course if you support innocence. It is all totally pointless jibeing. You mistakenly accused me of using science for my whole theory when I was only referring  to the bullet swap. You all dash in without thought.

[Adam]

On this thread Steve made the age comment David accused me of taking drugs and Jane made a contribution that did not address the issue but was more like a health and safety talk on Aga's .Adam has been told off for calling me mad. Jane thinks agreeing with one thing MT says undermines my argument. Just check their posts. It is all par for the course if you support innocence. It is all totally pointless jibeing. You mistakenly accused me of using science for my whole theory when I was only referring  to the bullet swap. You all dash in without thought.

Have I?

Roch did complain about reply 1. Before saying he will answer the questions. Of which I am still waiting.

[Adam]

Do you think it was the rifle barrel Dave? What was the purpose of someone intentionally burning Nevills back?

You know why.

[Zoso]

On this thread Steve made the age comment David accused me of taking drugs and Jane made a contribution that did not address the issue but was more like a health and safety talk on Aga's .Adam has been told off for calling me mad. Jane thinks agreeing with one thing MT says undermines my argument. Just check their posts. It is all par for the course if you support innocence. It is all totally pointless jibeing. You mistakenly accused me of using science for my whole theory when I was only referring  to the bullet swap. You all dash in without thought.

Why does it matter what others think of your theory? You're never going to get many (or any) guilty supporters to buy into them. It didn't bother Mike. I get jibed at all of the time - just ignore it and do you. It could be a LOT worse here and has been in the passed.

[Steve_uk]

On this thread Steve made the age comment David accused me of taking drugs and Jane made a contribution that did not address the issue but was more like a health and safety talk on Aga's .Adam has been told off for calling me mad. Jane thinks agreeing with one thing MT says undermines my argument. Just check their posts. It is all par for the course if you support innocence. It is all totally pointless jibeing. You mistakenly accused me of using science for my whole theory when I was only referring  to the bullet swap. You all dash in without thought.

It's not a Mexican standoff because we don't accept police shot Sheila. All the permutations the Defence has come up with over 38 years have failed, because rational people know they are falsifications.

I'm sure we're all sorry for the personal attacks. We've been on this site for years and take them with a pinch of salt.

[snow66!]

You know why.

I know what you think Adam.Besides I was asking Dave.

[snow66!]

Not all of them have always been like this. If Paul Harrison never came to this forum, it would be a very different place today.

Was Paul Harrison a member then Dave?

[Adam]

I know what you think Adam.Besides I was asking Dave.

Hopefully Dave answers.

Assume he thinks it's religious.

[snow66!]

Hopefully Dave answers.

Assume he thinks it's religious.

Religeous Adam?

[Bubo bubo]

Why does it matter what others think of your theory? You're never going to get many (or any) guilty supporters to buy into them. It didn't bother Mike. I get jibed at all of the time - just ignore it and do you. It could be a LOT worse here and has been in the passed.

It matters not to me but if I react to the crap that is thrown I am castigated and told to be civil. It seems civility is a one way street where only guilters are allowed to chide and goad but when an innocence supporter returns the favour we get our knuckles rapped. From what I observe it is always the guilters that instigate. Read the posts on this thread. Seems to me you view things from a guilter perspective. Wake up and see where the initial 'shit' is started.

[Zoso]

It matters not to me but if I react to the crap that is thrown I am castigated and told to be civil. It seems civility is a one way street where only guilters are allowed to chide and goad but when an innocence supporter returns the favour we get our knuckles rapped. From what I observe it is always the guilters that instigate. Read the posts on this thread. Seems to me you view things from a guilter perspective. Wake up and see where the initial 'shit' is started.

I've had loads of crap on here, when I thought Bamber innocent, it came from the guilty side. That changed when I changed my mind. Obviously, the people who don't agree with you are more likely to be the ones to goad