I was trying to ask about the question in in post 531 and your answer to it 'completely'. Under what grounds can you difinitively rule out the Aga as the cause?
For starters, he clearly states that the Aga was on FULL heat for his experiment. In the reality of the case, why would it be? Early hours of the morning in mid summer? Also, distance apart seems to work but the larger burn has a part in the centre that isn't burned. The handle of the Aga that he suggests may have caused it, has a rounded surface, which means the centre part of the handle would be in contact with the skin and there would be no unburned centre. Also, why hasn't he shown the pig skin that he used? That would have shown if the marks were caused by the AGA because they should be the same shape/size etc.
You're also saying to not look at the AGA theory and the theory that the police moved Nevill - together, but that's he whole premise. You can't look at one without the other - there has to be a reason why he'd be laying against the AGA one minute, then moved to another location. This actually points more to Jeremy. Sheila could never move him in a month of Sunday's and the police would have NO REASON.
Like I said, none starter for me.