Would Bamber have gone ahead if Julie was staying at Head Street?

[Adam]

Do you believe that prior to August 7th 1985 and at least from April 1984 when Bamber commenced work at WHF and moved into 9 head street that Shelia Daniel and Nicholas had stayed at WHF for more than couple of nights in succession?

Suspect Sheila stayed every few months.

Whether the twins were always with her is another issue. CC had access & drove them all there in August.

The 7th August 1985 was a rare opportunity for Bamber in my view.

[ILB]

Suspect Sheila stayed every few months.

Whether the twins were always with her is another issue. CC had access & drove them all there in August.

The 7th August 1985 was a rare opportunity for Bamber in my view.

What do you believe lit the touch paper that Tuesday evening ?

I believe if gulity he heard something he didn't like

His kitchen table discussion might well have been true. But no about fostering

[Adam]

What do you believe lit the touch paper that Tuesday evening ?

I believe if gulity he heard something he didn't like

His kitchen table discussion might well have been true. But no about fostering

It was just a rare opportunity - everyone at WHF. Sheila docile.

Together with the several months of planning.

The bike had arrived the previous weekend. It was then a case of when Sheila was docile enough.  Or a last resort, last night attack before they left.

Believe Sheila was due to be there a few days more.

[Adam]

Suspect Sheila, Daniel and Nicholas being at WHF at the same time was a once a year event.

A lot of logistics involved -

Sheila being well enough.

Nevill and June being available. 

The twins under CC being available.

----------

Sheila visiting on her own would have been more frequent.

This meant for Bamber 7/8/85 was a rare opportunity.

[Adam]

Possible the twins were at WHF without Sheila.

Nevill & June would have been able to contact CC & offer support.

If Sheila was in hospital, then she would not have been there.

Again this is no good for Bamber.