View dismissed: No response regarding Nevill's back marks not being burns.

[Adam]

Not heard anything back from Cambridge or Zoso.

As far as I know they are the only ones who say the marks on Nevill's back are not burns. From either stance.

Dismissing expert opinion from Vanezis, Boyce, Caraso, Manlove, Fletcher & Fowler. Together with strong circumstantial evidence & opinions of Wilkes, Carol Ann Lee and Judge Drake. 

Cambridge did not appear on the forum for a long time after my thread dated 6th December 2022 on the burns. Eventually replying 39 days later. Her main reason for saying they are not burns is that Professor Knight said they are marks from 'prodding'. Which is not surprising as he was a defence expert. She has never given a credible alternative explanation.

Zoso said she does not believe they are burns 3 days ago. She has not elaborated. Which is disappointing as it is a discussion forum.

Neither have responded to recent threads/posts.

The view that they are not burns has been dismissed.

[Zoso]

Not heard anything back from Cambridge or Zoso.

As far as I know they are the only ones who say the marks on Nevill's back are not burns. From either stance.

Dismissing expert opinion from Vanezis, Boyce, Caraso, Manlove, Fletcher & Fowler. Together with strong circumstantial evidence & opinions of Wilkes, Carol Ann Lee and Judge Drake. 

Cambridge did not appear on the forum for a long time after my thread dated 6th December 2022 on the burns. Eventually replying 39 days later. Her main reason for saying they are not burns is that Professor Knight said they are marks from 'prodding'. Which is not surprising as he was a defence expert. She has never given a credible alternative explanation.

Zoso said she does not believe they are burns 3 days ago. She has not elaborated. Which is disappointing as it is a discussion forum.

Neither have responded to recent threads/posts.

The view that they are not burns has been dismissed.

Heard back to what? I haven't been on the forum or read your posts on the subject. What more is there to say? They don't look like burns to me and I can't see Bamber doing that - for what ends? Even if they are, it doesn't prove who is responsible.

[Adam]

Heard back to what? I haven't been on the forum or read your posts on the subject. What more is there to say? They don't look like burns to me and I can't see Bamber doing that - for what ends? Even if they are, it doesn't prove who is responsible.

I'll post the thread links for you. One for the second time.

You were on the forum yesterday as posted on the JB Forum thread.

Do you think the experts were wrong?

What do they look like?

Do you agree Nevill is in the perfect position to have his pyjama top pulled up & back burnt?

[Adam]

Sorry forgot to put these up yesterday for Zoso -

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11631.0.html

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11541.0.html

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11633.0.html

----------

[Adam]

The prosecution case is they are burns. Inflicted by Bamber to check for signs of life.

The 2012 CCRC application was they are burns inflicted by Sheila as they believe the silencer was off when inflicted. 

The CT are now saying Nevill was topless in the kitchen & fell sideways onto a hot part of the aga. Where he stayed for several hours. The police put his pyjama top on & moved him onto the chair/coal scuttle prior to crime scene photos being taken.

[Adam]

Still not had a response from Cambridge or Zoso.

Suspect Cambridge was the only person saying they are not burns for attention.

Zoso said for the first time she did not think they were burns a few days ago to stick up for Cambridge. Has not elaborated.

No more discussion on whether they are burns or not. Just how the burns occurred.

[Rob_]

Still not had a response from Cambridge or Zoso.

Suspect Cambridge was the only person saying they are not burns for attention.

Zoso said for the first time she did not think they were burns a few days ago to stick up for Cambridge.

No more discussion on whether they are burns or not. Just how the burns occurred.

I am not a expert Adam but they don't look like normal second or third degree burns?

If Nevil died lying against the Aga maybe that's why the burns if they are burns look different?

You are trying to make Bamber look cruel and evil that's why you insist they are burns caused by him.

[Adam]

I am not a expert Adam but they don't look like normal second or third degree burns?

If Nevil died lying against the Aga maybe that's why the burns if they are burns look different?

You are trying to make Bamber look cruel and evil that's why you insist they are burns caused by him.

Seven experts have spoken. No more discussion on whether they are burns.

You believe Nevill was topless & laid sideways on an apparent hot part of the aga for several hours.

You have a right to believe that.

[Rob_]

Seven experts have spoken. No more discussion on whether they are burns.

You believe Nevill was topless & laid sideways on an apparent hot part of the aga for several hours.

You have a right to believe that.

No he was not topless Adam, I am open minded that's all if they are burns.

If the Aga is a possible source for the makes that greatly helps Bamber.

[Adam]

No he was not topless Adam, I am open minded that's all if they are burns.

If the Aga is a possible source for the makes that greatly helps Bamber.

How could the aga spend several hours burning his skin but not his pyjama top?

[Rob_]

How could the aga spend several hours burning his skin but not his pyjama top?

45 degrees would not burn material but the heat would transfer to burn skin.

[Adam]

45 degrees would not burn material but the heat would transfer to burn skin.

Please provide sources.

More plausible to say the police put Nevill's pyjama top on.