0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
13 year olds may become difficult. Adults no. Bamber's hatred for a man in his 20's was very severe. According to Julie, Mary, James Richards, Brett & Bamber himself.
Don't dispute that MM was in r :-*regards to bamber venting frustration about June.He may have done on many of occasion.This however only became damaging against him because of the circumstance of being charged of five counts of murder.Other than that it's a common thing that half of adolescents and early twenties do on a regular basis.From a police perspective it's a giftFrom reality you can balance it
So he could walk in the dark but not cycle..Between 2 locations he lived/had lived at & worked at.
So a lot ties Bamber to cycling on the bike. However there is no CCTV or witnesses that saw him on it or any of the victims blood on the bike.
It really doesn't to put it bluntly.If a space hopper or pogo stick was found at bourtree it could have been insinuated that he had used that.
I don't agree that the prosecution case would have ever been Bamber got to/from WHF on a space hopper or pogo stick. But cycling is a very strong narrative for the reasons in my thread post.
It's a mode of transport. Same as the car.Without the bike being there. They'd have said he had drove.His QC would have countered it been madness in him doing this. As somebody would have seen him.
Bamber stated the bike had been at his cottage for a period of six to eight weeks prior the massacre.Nothing to be honest to dispute this. It could have been borrowed for a mundane reason. Whether it been for Julie, car trouble, anythinf
No he said it had been at his cottage around 6 weeks when interviewed. Which was a month after the massacre. He was very vague. Julie only saw the bike on her last visit.
The next question is----was there a bell on the bike ?