My view on what time Bamber called his AM.

[ILB]

I don't believe the defence at trial or the CT have really questioned the prosecution narrative - Bamber phoned his cottage from WHF, then cycled back and called the police.

It is all straight forward.

It's not straight forward at all.

It can't be proved.

You are just projecting theories.

Without evidence to substantiate

[ILB]

In regards to the phonecalls

The technology wasn't there to prove or disprove

It's simple as that.

[Adam]

It's not straight forward at all.

It can't be proved.

You are just projecting theories.

Without evidence to substantiate

It is the prosecution theory.

The forensic evidence confirming Bamber is guilty is in the COA & other documents.

[ILB]

It is the prosecution theory.

The forensic evidence confirming Bamber is guilty is in the COA & other documents.

Theory yes. Not proof

[David1819]

It's not straight forward at all.

It can't be proved.

You are just projecting theories.

Without evidence to substantiate

Robert Boutflour came up with the Bike idea which he passed onto Stan Jones. Jones then passed the idea onto Julie and it later became part of the BS she concocted. That is pretty much all there is to it.

[Adam]

Robert Boutflour came up with the Bike idea which he passed onto Stan Jones. Jones then passed the idea onto Julie and it later became part of the BS she concocted. That is pretty much all there is to it.

You think Stan Jones fed Julie information for her to put into her WS?

Why would Jones then not omit Matthew McDonald from her WS?

Bamber has never denied Julie saw the bike at his cottage pre massacre.

[ILB]

You think Stan Jones fed Julie information for her to put into her WS?

Why would Jones then not omit Matthew McDonald from her WS?

Bamber has never denied Julie saw the bike at his cottage pre massacre.

Why would he deny the bike being at his cottage.

He himself said if had there for up to 8 weeks

Do believe the idea from the police was bourne out of RWB suggestion though

[Adam]

Why would he deny the bike being at his cottage.

He himself said if had there for up to 8 weeks

Do believe the idea from the police was bourne out of RWB suggestion though

Bamber said the bike had been there around 5 weeks. A month after the massacre.

I believe Bamber told Julie he planned to cycle. Which is in her WS.

[David1819]

You think Stan Jones fed Julie information for her to put into her WS?

Correct

Why would Jones then not omit Matthew McDonald from her WS?

Because he was a halfwit who thought Julie was being honest. He didn't know or understand that Julie was using ideas she heard from him or others. He thought she had confirmed the ideas he brought up, he was too stupid to realise Julie had simply agreed with things he had brought up.

[Adam]

Correct

Because he was a halfwit who thought Julie was being honest. He didn't know or understand that Julie was using ideas she heard from him or others. He thought she had confirmed the ideas he brought up, he was too stupid to realise Julie had simply agreed with things he had brought up.

So you now believe the police were involved in the framing of Bamber. Rather than just the relatives.

[ILB]

Bamber said the bike had been there around 5 weeks. A month after the massacre.

I believe Bamber told Julie he planned to cycle. Which is in her WS.

He said six to eight weeks.

[ILB]

Bamber said the bike had been there around 5 weeks. A month after the massacre.

I believe Bamber told Julie he planned to cycle. Which is in her WS.

If you look at the timeline of the bike. In regards to all rwb ep and JM it fits very well doesn't it. If you put things into chronological order

[Adam]

He said six to eight weeks.

I will have to read the police interviews.

Julie first saw the bike the weekend before Bamber committed the massacre.

[Steve_uk]

Correct

Because he was a halfwit who thought Julie was being honest. He didn't know or understand that Julie was using ideas she heard from him or others. He thought she had confirmed the ideas he brought up, he was too stupid to realise Julie had simply agreed with things he had brought up.

Julie would have been the halfwit had she invented the Matthew McDonald story.

[ILB]

I will have to read the police interviews.

Julie first saw the bike the weekend before Bamber committed the massacre.

Why do we discuss the bike in so much detail? Why is empathise put upon it.

Even if guilty. He had the options of two other modes of transport. He could drive. He could also walk.