Author Topic: Stephen Brian Smith.  (Read 1522 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Zoso

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1635
Re: Stephen Brian Smith.
« Reply #60 on: November 30, 2023, 07:34:PM »
Of course I am but you just wish to play games. It is up to you to provide a reasoned counter argument if you disagree with my position, rather than indulge in nonsensical frivolous comments. You may call it being argumentative whereas I am inviting you to a debate with which you fail to engage. You do yourself no favours by refusing to engage, which tends to suggest that you have no answers to the evidence I present. I have at times complained to moderators but not about you or as many times as others I could name.

I take the possible MOJ of JB very seriously not just at a personal level for him who may have had his life taken away but also for the overall importance of our Criminal Justice system as a whole and whilst I may sometimes  engage in a joke or two I prefer to engage with the evidence as I see it. You on the other hand refuse to engage in anything other than parroting the Crown's case which you do not defend by producing any cogent arguments that challenge my views.

The reason this case has dragged on for over thirty years is IMO because of the State wishes to protect itself from the seismic repercussions the would shake the Judicial system to its core if it was proved that he was framed by the police and his case was deliberately stalled on numerous occasions by using that very same system to keep him imprisoned.

About what? I wasn't even talking to you, I was talking to Snow and you BUTT in. I gave up with you when you made incorrect comments and didn't have the grace to admit to being wrong, I can't be bothered with that kind of childish arrogance and just treat it with contempt. So that's where we are with THAT!

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 37164
Re: Stephen Brian Smith.
« Reply #61 on: November 30, 2023, 07:50:PM »
I do not wish to shake the system to its core. I am concerned about true justice. In that case perhaps you would like to explain why there is a 'false timeline' and why it was constructed. If people do not address the questions I pose or the suggestions I make, I take the view that there is in their mind, either that,  there is no merit in the point raised or that they cannot produce a reasoned argument to counter it.

Such responses to my way of thinking suggests that I am correct in my assertion. The reason I re-challenge is not because they just ignore it and give a simple frivolous reply but because they are anti JB and cannot address issues which suggest he is innocent.

Frivolous responses to serious questions might be considered goading since there is no considered response only childish sarcasm.

I challenge both you and Zozo to explain the 'false timeline'

I don't think there is much chance of that happening.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2370
Re: Stephen Brian Smith.
« Reply #62 on: November 30, 2023, 08:03:PM »
About what? I wasn't even talking to you, I was talking to Snow and you BUTT in. I gave up with you when you made incorrect comments and didn't have the grace to admit to being wrong, I can't be bothered with that kind of childish arrogance and just treat it with contempt. So that's where we are with THAT!
Oh dear oh dear oh dear. You are so out of order. I suppose we are asked to believe the below response was aimed at Snow. Posters will know that this was aimed at me and I have already explained that I responded to your latest post. You are making yourself look a fool and an idiot and have still not addressed my points except to produce childish responses.

Sorry? All I heard there was a hoot and a screech  ???

Try responding to this.
quote author=Bubo bubo link=topic=12026.msg555339#msg555339 date=1701365446]
I do not wish to shake the system to its core. I am concerned about true justice. In that case perhaps you would like to explain why there is a 'false timeline' and why it was constructed. If people do not address the questions I pose or the suggestions I make, I take the view that there is in their mind, either that,  there is no merit in the point raised or that they cannot produce a reasoned argument to counter it.

Such responses to my way of thinking suggests that I am correct in my assertion. The reason I re-challenge is not because they just ignore it and give a simple frivolous reply but because they are anti JB and cannot address issues which suggest he is innocent.

Frivolous responses to serious questions might be considered goading since there is no considered response only childish sarcasm.

I challenge both you and Zozo to explain the 'false timeline'
[/quote]

Offline Zoso

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1635
Re: Stephen Brian Smith.
« Reply #63 on: December 01, 2023, 12:20:PM »
Oh dear oh dear oh dear. You are so out of order. I suppose we are asked to believe the below response was aimed at Snow. Posters will know that this was aimed at me and I have already explained that I responded to your latest post. You are making yourself look a fool and an idiot and have still not addressed my points except to produce childish responses.

Try responding to this.
quote author=Bubo bubo link=topic=12026.msg555339#msg555339 date=1701365446]
I do not wish to shake the system to its core. I am concerned about true justice. In that case perhaps you would like to explain why there is a 'false timeline' and why it was constructed. If people do not address the questions I pose or the suggestions I make, I take the view that there is in their mind, either that,  there is no merit in the point raised or that they cannot produce a reasoned argument to counter it.

Such responses to my way of thinking suggests that I am correct in my assertion. The reason I re-challenge is not because they just ignore it and give a simple frivolous reply but because they are anti JB and cannot address issues which suggest he is innocent.

Frivolous responses to serious questions might be considered goading since there is no considered response only childish sarcasm.

I challenge both you and Zozo to explain the 'false timeline'

I am talking about way back when you butted in to my response to Snow with your personal BS! YES! The above post was aimed at you - the one below, was not but you couldn't help butt in and tell me what my trouble was/is. Yours is that you're a supercilious wind bag, who's posts are far too long because you have an inflated sense of worth and believe people are that THAT interested, they will read to the end. Those posters are few (if any).
« Last Edit: December 01, 2023, 01:43:PM by Zoso »