Author Topic: The Lucy Letby trial  (Read 44124 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RodCrosby

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #585 on: February 07, 2025, 12:33:AM »
I have never ever seen a singe post of yours that makes any sense. You just spout hatred.
I knew yesterday was coming months aga. It was clear from the very beginning if you researched the case properly. Just accept you have made a fool of yourself. Again

Poor Old "They're ALL Guilty" Steve_uk...

Even when the Court of Appeal says: "No. There is NO Evidence" (WH Wallace). Steve_uk says: "Guilty"...

Even when the Police say: "OK. We're now looking for the real killer" (Jonathan Jones). Steve_uk says: "Guilty"...


And then misrepresents the evidence to support his own Prejudices and Fancies.

Pitiful...
"I make a point of never having any prejudices, and of following docilely wherever fact may lead me..."
Sherlock Holmes in The Adventure of the Reigate Squires

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20380
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #586 on: February 07, 2025, 05:50:AM »
Poor Old "They're ALL Guilty" Steve_uk...

Even when the Court of Appeal says: "No. There is NO Evidence" (WH Wallace). Steve_uk says: "Guilty"...

Even when the Police say: "OK. We're now looking for the real killer" (Jonathan Jones). Steve_uk says: "Guilty"...


And then misrepresents the evidence to support his own Prejudices and Fancies.

Pitiful...
You can add Barry George and Sheila Bowler to that list.

One has to jump through hoops to maintain innocence of all these people. Julia was wearing a mackintosh, Megan and Harry Tooze just happened to be murdered when Jonathan Jones was wandering around Orpington looking for premises for a non-existent business he was about to start, Sheila Bowler decided to take her aunt on a detour which conveniently offered cover of darkness.

Re: Lucy Letby. She might well have done it. I'm sure you can get experts who will reaffirm there was a poisoner on the ward. The Defence admitted as such. She's smart enough to deny allegations put to her, not smart enough to aspire to be a doctor. Sorry if that sounds harsh. She saw life passing her by, possibly hoping to marry a doctor and start a family. The centre of her parents' world, who couldn't see through her. She had power in that domain, but not in her professional life.

William Herbert Wallace: no real friends, married a woman who claimed to be seventeen years younger. Anecdotal evidence she thought she had married beneath her. No possibility of children given her age. Wallace in the second division of the chess club, no real fulfilment.

Barry George: convictions for attempted rape, indecent assault. Determined to leave no witnesses behind next time. Obsession with guns. A particle and thread on trousers.

Your post is ironic really, in the week I have declared Luke Mitchell's conviction unsafe. But that doesn't tally with your narrative.
« Last Edit: February 07, 2025, 05:52:AM by Steve_uk »

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3878
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #587 on: February 07, 2025, 07:41:AM »
Send for the men in white coats

There will always be many miscarriage of justice cases in this country when people like you sit on jury’s

What a sad life you must lead to make personal comments about life

She had a good job, her own house car, good social life and numerous friends that have stuck by her even when it’s not a good look to support a ‘murderer’
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20380
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #588 on: February 08, 2025, 11:11:PM »
I've read the two new threads on Ms. Letby, and wonder if they were really necessary. Maybe it says more about the poster than it does myself, that there has to be an addendum-a side-show if you will to detract from the original thread. As the old saying goes: imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

I don't usually cut and paste more than a few lines, but I draw members' attention to the following paragraphs. NB: I won't be commenting on the aforementioned threads. The original one is quite enough.


Key evidence in the prosecution case

Medical records
these were crucial to establish the condition of the babies when they were attacked. When some babies recovered, the speed of their recovery was too sudden to be seen as a natural occurrence. Several medical documents featured falsified notes made by Letby to hide her involvement. She amended timings on several documents in an attempt to distance herself from incidents where babies had suddenly become severely unwell.


Text messages and social media activity – these were an important part of the case as they coincided with the attacks happening on the neonatal Unit. They were dated and timed, sometimes they were similar to a live blogging of events. They also explained how Letby deceived her colleagues into believing that these inexplicable collapses were simply a natural worsening of children’s underlying conditions. They also revealed an intrusive curiosity about the parents of babies she had harmed.


Staff rotas – we were able to show the jury that Letby was the one common denominator in the series of deaths and sudden collapses on the neonatal unit. We were also able to show the jury that many of the earlier incidents occurred overnight, but when Letby was put onto day shifts, the collapses and deaths began occurring in the day. We were able to corroborate this further using Letby’s personal diary in which she had noted her shift patterns.

Handwritten notes and diaries – many handwritten notes were discovered by police during their investigation. They included phrases such as: “I killed them on purpose because I’m not good enough to care for them”; “I am evil I did this”; and “today is your birthday and you are not here and I am so sorry for that”. These notes gave an insight into her mindset following her attacks.

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3271
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #589 on: February 08, 2025, 11:25:PM »
    I've read the two new threads on Ms. Letby, and wonder if they were really necessary. Steve

     I just looked on your stats, Steve. 459 threads started, most of them un-commented on. I doubt you are the person to be throwing accusations of "un-necessary threads" around. Have some self awareness.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20380
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #590 on: February 09, 2025, 12:31:AM »
    I've read the two new threads on Ms. Letby, and wonder if they were really necessary. Steve

     I just looked on your stats, Steve. 459 threads started, most of them un-commented on. I doubt you are the person to be throwing accusations of "un-necessary threads" around. Have some self awareness.
..and I suggest that you stick with your BRICS posts and your love affair with Putin and Xi, instead of promulgating ad hominem attacks.

Online Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17427
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #591 on: February 10, 2025, 01:23:PM »
There's a Letby/CCRC article in Guardian.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2025, 02:15:PM by Roch »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17197
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #592 on: February 10, 2025, 02:55:PM »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43462
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #593 on: February 10, 2025, 03:13:PM »
Wasn't LL convicted of multiple murders at different times.

They can't all be wrong.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5619
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #594 on: February 10, 2025, 04:43:PM »
richardand judy have got inolved https://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/richard-and-judy/2011550/lucy-letby-wrongful-convictions

Just need to get the daughter on board and the CoA judges will be running for the hills.
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

Best goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5619
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #595 on: February 10, 2025, 04:45:PM »
Wasn't LL convicted of multiple murders at different times.

They can't all be wrong.

Sally Clark was convicted of murdering her sons at different times.  The experts called it wrong and her conviction was quashed.
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

Best goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3271
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #596 on: February 10, 2025, 06:00:PM »
Sally Clark was convicted of murdering her sons at different times.  The experts called it wrong and her conviction was quashed.
   The two things that the Sally Clark and Lucy Letby cases have in common is that in both cases there weren’t any murders at all and both relied on “expert evidence” by discredited hacks.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 43462
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #597 on: February 10, 2025, 06:12:PM »
Sally Clark was convicted of murdering her sons at different times.  The experts called it wrong and her conviction was quashed.

She was convicted of the murders of seven infants and the attempted murders of seven others between June 2015 and June 2016.

Hard work ahead.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3271
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #598 on: February 10, 2025, 06:35:PM »
She was convicted of the murders of seven infants and the attempted murders of seven others between June 2015 and June 2016.

Hard work ahead
  You haven’t been paying attention, Adam. The hard work has already been done. All of the babies died of natural causes and poor medical care. A “dream team” of world class neonatal experts has examined the same notes and records as the charlatan Dewi Evans and very thoroughly and publicly trashed his findings. Those new reports are very public and currently with the CCRC. I would be doubtful that any expert would dare put Evan’s “theories” to a court in any retrial because the case is in tatters and the reputations of those involved in this frame up are in the gutter.There is no case left against LL.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17197
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The Lucy Letby trial
« Reply #599 on: February 10, 2025, 06:53:PM »
from uk colum desetrbing staff about dr evans https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-3rd-february-2025
« Last Edit: February 10, 2025, 07:06:PM by nugnug »