The Lucy Letby trial

[nugnug]

charity refused to engage dont blame them https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/01/lucy-letby-whistleblowers-red-flags-charity-testimony/

[Cambridgecutie]

I wonder how the jurors are feeling?

[Steve_uk]

I wonder how the jurors are feeling?

Well, it's not their fault if misleading or erroneous evidence was put to them. I wonder why Lucy Letby refused to turn up in court for the sentencing.

[JackieD]

Well, it's not their fault if misleading or erroneous evidence was put to them. I wonder why Lucy Letby refused to turn up in court for the sentencing.

You complete idiot NGB has already made it clear why she didn’t turn up for sentencing

Your thoughts on this case are way off as usual or have 14 experts got it wrong

There was never going to be a jury of 12 people who would have even understood the medical evidence in this case

[Cambridgecutie]

Well, it's not their fault if misleading or erroneous evidence was put to them. I wonder why Lucy Letby refused to turn up in court for the sentencing.

I appreciate that but they will surely feel perturbed?  I think I would be furious and demanding to see my MP and gathering the other jurors for a meeting.

[Steve_uk]

You complete idiot NGB has already made it clear why she didn’t turn up for sentencing

Your thoughts on this case are way off as usual or have 14 experts got it wrong

There was never going to be a jury of 12 people who would have even understood the medical evidence in this case

..and I made it clear that when the Defence admitted there was a poisoner on the ward the Rubicon had been crossed. I will ignore your outburst along with David's because both of you are mentally and emotionally damaged in some way. I'd rather not speculate further for modesty's sake.

[JackieD]

You are just here to cause trouble

Why are you asking for the reason Lucy didn’t turn up for sentencing when you have a good idea already

[Steve_uk]

You are just here to cause trouble

Why are you asking for the reason Lucy didn’t turn up for sentencing when you have a good idea already

I'd like an answer please. It's a straightforward question and it deserved a straightforward answer, not referring me to another member slagging me off in the process.

[JackieD]

I wonder how the jurors are feeling?

I expect the same as the Bamber Jury when they saw Mugford on the front of the NOTW in her under where knowing Mugford got paid for giving evidence against JB

[Steve_uk]

I expect the same as the Bamber Jury when they saw Mugford on the front of the NOTW in her under where knowing Mugford got paid for giving evidence against JB

I still don't have an answer to the question I posed. I will answer it myself, though: she is a control freak, she always has been a control freak, she was sulking at the verdict, she has hoodwinked millions of gullible supporters along the way, she is guilty as hell, but may well get off on technicalities the general public find difficult to understand.

[Cambridgecutie]

I still don't have an answer to the question I posed. I will answer it myself, though: she is a control freak, she always has been a control freak, she was sulking at the verdict, she has hoodwinked millions of gullible supporters along the way, she is guilty as hell, but may well get off on technicalities the general public find difficult to understand.

I would hardly call the panel of experts the defence has on board "gullible supporters" 

[Steve_uk]

I would hardly call the panel of experts the defence has on board "gullible supporters" 

The general public count in their millions. The panel of experts are an infinitesimal number.

[Cambridgecutie]

The general public count in their millions. The panel of experts are an infinitesimal number.

Yes but its the experts who have influence over whether the verdict stands or falls. 

I'm not aware there's much support from the general public? 

[JackieD]

I still don't have an answer to the question I posed. I will answer it myself, though: she is a control freak, she always has been a control freak, she was sulking at the verdict, she has hoodwinked millions of gullible supporters along the way, she is guilty as hell, but may well get off on technicalities the general public find difficult to understand.

I have never ever seen a singe post of yours that makes any sense. You just spout hatred.
I knew yesterday was coming months aga. It was clear from the very beginning if you researched the case properly. Just accept you have made a fool of yourself. Again

[Steve_uk]

I have never ever seen a singe post of yours that makes any sense. You just spout hatred.
I knew yesterday was coming months aga. It was clear from the very beginning if you researched the case properly. Just accept you have made a fool of yourself. Again

Well, it's ironic that I have changed my stance on the Luke Mitchell case this very evening, but you are probably too stupid to notice. I think there is reasonable doubt. What a pity you are not of the same calibre as Sandra Lean.

I am entitled to my view that the Jeremy Bamber and Lucy Letby convictions are safe, though mounting pressure on the latter case may well result in her release.