'Ignore the contents of this letter' at 'peril' ...

[Steve_uk]

Hi Lookout,

'She' couldn't [have] 'because' of two factors, (1) 'Christine Jay' was not ['Sheila Caffells'] natural, 'biological', 'birth mother', and as such, 'she would never have known' the [biolohical] 'identity of the birth father', she only 'held the title' of being ['Sheilas'] her 'legal birth mother'. She was 'simply a participant' in 'the role' [that she played] of being  a 'legal birth mother' in a '[bizzarre] adoption practice' and 'required process' in 'a sex abuse scandal', which required 'specific' and 'necessary measures', if the 'abuse scandal'  was able 'to continue [unrecognised] 'behind the scene'...

We don't know this for sure. Why would Crhristine Jay fly transatlantic on a wild goose chase anyway?

[mike tesko]

We don't know this for sure. Why would Crhristine Jay fly transatlantic on a wild goose chase anyway?

She, 'did what she felt that she had to do', to see the extent 'that the lies about 'the true identity of the biological birth mother', rather than, 'herself', being 'that', despite 'the role she played out' in the 'sex scandal', of her being the 'legal birth mother' (only) to 'Sheila' [when 'it may never have been', or 'never able to be a proven fact' or [that] 'no such thing', 'had', or 'hadn't', been 'true' beyond belief'!!