'HISTORY' of the 'Silencer' that was used to inflict one of the shots to 'SC'...

[mike tesko]

Such is the way that all lab' items are received at the lab' in sequential order, that it becomes an easy task to check and to make sure that evidence being relied upon in a prosecution  was received and dealt with correctly. I have to say [that in the instant case] that somebody has been tampering with the system, not only by attributing the reco ery, find and production to the lab' for examination, by assigning an item different exhibit references, but that an attempt has been made to try and conceal the wrong that has been applied, by going a step further and altering [the lab'] 'item number' for that exhibit!

But, they did not bargain for somebody like me, who has been through the same abominable practice, that cops, the cps, and in many instances, the judicial system chooses to pretend that nothing untoward has occurred ['BUT BELIEVE  ME IT DOES AND HAS  TAKEN PLACE]...

What these so called public servants appear to be doing, amounts to a criminal offence on their part, for every  single deception and fraud, they get themselves involved with. Worse still, for these ungodly practices to be swept into its admissibility, they have to involve other people to be able to dishonestly hoodwink, the public, defendants, juries - so it amounts to these or those who continue to introduce false evidence, - [that] - they are 'conspiring to pervert the course of justice'. So 'who are the real criminals'?

[mike tesko]

There was no silencer fitted to the end of the .22 semi-automatic rifle, irrespective if someone fired shots [with it] during the tragedy, or not!

[mike tesko]

Such is the way that all lab' items are received at the lab' in sequential order, that it becomes an easy task to check and to make sure that evidence being relied upon in a prosecution  was received and dealt with correctly. I have to say [that in the instant case] that somebody has been tampering with the system, not only by attributing the reco ery, find and production to the lab' for examination, by assigning an item different exhibit references, but that an attempt has been made to try and conceal the wrong that has been applied, by going a step further and altering [the lab'] 'item number' for that exhibit!

Those involved in these practices were many in the instant case!

[mike tesko]

What these so called public servants appear to be doing, amounts to a criminal offence on their part, for every  single deception and fraud, they get themselves involved with. Worse still, for these ungodly practices to be swept into its admissibility, they have to involve other people to be able to dishonestly hoodwink, the public, defendants, juries - so it amounts to these or those who continue to introduce false evidence, - [that] - they are 'conspiring to pervert the course of justice'. So 'who are the real criminals'?

Such is the way that all lab' items are received at the lab' in sequential order, that it becomes an easy task to check and to make sure that evidence being relied upon in a prosecution  was received and dealt with correctly. I have to say [that in the instant case] that somebody has been tampering with the system, [ on other occasions]not only by attributing 'the recovery', 'find' and 'production to the lab' for examinations, by 'assigning an item different exhibit references, but that an attempt has [also] been made to try and conceal the wrong that has been applied, by 'going a step further' and 'altering' [the lab'] 'item number' for 'that exhibit'!

But, they did not bargain for somebody like me, who has been through the same abominable practice, that cops, the cps, and in many instances, the judicial system chooses to pretend that nothing untoward has occurred ['BUT BELIEVE  ME IT DOES AND HAS  TAKEN PLACE]... 

[mike tesko]

But, they did not bargain for somebody like me, who has been through the same abominable practice, that cops, the cps, and in many instances, the judicial system chooses to pretend that nothing untoward has occurred ['BUT BELIEVE  ME IT DOES AND HAS  TAKEN PLACE]... 

It was as a result of official complaints lodged by myself in the mid 1980's, that led to the uncovering of police officers being involved in 'pocketbook entry frauds' and the making of false witness statements created by someone else and tended into evidence! Eventually the investigation into these matters conducted by 'Greater Manchester police' resulted favourably with regards to the overturning of the inquest verdicts of the 96 Liverpool fans, at ' Hillsborough stadium'. I was right in making those complaints, just like I am right now, regarding the tampering with items of evidential value, being interfered with, as part of a widespread practice where exhibit references, and lab' item numbers get altered..

[mike tesko]

Here are pieces of evidential value,  which has either different 'exhibit references', or 'different lab item numbers' for the same item', at 'different stages of the same investigation' or 'all three variations at one and the same time', or 'in accumulative steps'

Silencer lab item no. 22
Silencer lab item no. 23
Silencer 'SBJ/1'
Silencer 'SJ/1'
Silencer 'DB/1'
Silencer 'DRB/1'

Above sent and received at lab' on the following dates

13th August 1985
30th August 1985
20th September 1985

Silencer handed over to police by different people on different occasions

'Peter Eaton' on 12th August 1985
'Ann Eaton' on 11th September  1985

Different number of internal baffle plates inside silencer

'SBJ/1' - 17 baffles
'SJ/1' -17 baffles
'DB/1' - (was 'a flake of dried blood' recovered by 'David Boutflour'
'DRB/1 - 15 baffles
 
Cloth pull through of .22 semi-automatic rifle

'Lab item reference number [sequence] altered'

'Cloth pull-through was placed inside the inner barrel of .22 semi-automatic rifle, after it had been fired using test fired rounds of ammunition'

'The transformation of a crime scene bullet'

'Crime scene bullet [PV/20 - refers to shooting of 'Sheila Caffell'] was originally 'a fragmented bullet, which miraculously turned into a whole bullet'

'Individual exhibit references' and 'lab item numbers' are 'missing', or 'have been ignored', 'altogether', resulting in the following..

'Two of the 29 live rounds of .22 [ Ely manufacturered] ammunition that were test fired in the .22 semi-automatic rifle, remain unaccounted for'

'The .22 semi-automatic rifles metal end cap' without any 'exhibit reference' and or 'lab item number', even though it must have been scientifically examined and checked for 'damage', 'contamination with blood' and 'red paint particles' from 'scratched kitchen aga suround' at 'the scene' (scant information regarding, 'who found' or 'recovered this metal end cap', the 'circumstances it was recovered in', leading to 'the possibility' that exhibit 'DB/1'[lab item number 23] was infact, references to the metal endcap that normally fitted onto the end of the .22 semi-automatic rifles barrel'...

'who examined the silencer' [first and foremost] and ['potentially'] found 'blood inside between baffle plates' and 'crushed red paint particles' in the knurled pattern of the silencers metal end cap'..

'David Boutflour'?
And 'as yet', an 'unidentified relative'?
'DI Cook'?
'John Haywood'?
'Glynis Howard'?
'Brian Elliot'?
'Malcolm Fletcher'?

'A total absence' of any 'diagrams', 'photographs' or 'documentation' from the lab' concerning 'the size', 'shape' and all relevant measurements' of 'lab items of evidential value' at 'the time it was received', 'found', or 'it was 'metamophosized' into 'a different piece of scientific evidence'..

'With  no reference' or 'mention to'  [of] 'blood found inside the dismantled silencer', and 'red paint particles' on ' the outside of the silencer' at the point of discovery [by 'whom', or 'whoever' and even 'whenever'] prior to the flake ['not a number of different flakes'] being made into a solution'! The 'flake itself' did 'not have its own exhibit reference' or 'a lab item number' before 'it's evolution' of 'becoming a solution', from which 'blood group results' were 'subsequently obtained' in 'imaginary circumstances'. There did not exist 'an exhibit reference ' or 'a lab item number' for 'the flake', the original solution the flake was allegedly made into' or 'the additional five separate potions of fluid'   it got turned into' as 'derived from the original flake', so that tests could be conducted with regards to individual blood group testing, on different days [12th, 13th, 18th and the 19th September 1985]. None of the obtained blood group results obtained on the aforementioned  dates, had 'exhibit references' or 'lab item numbers' - it was a 'Mickey Mouse' approach 'to serious' and 'important issues' which made it almost astonishingly impossible' for any other 'expert witness' to 'follow' and 'investigate thoroughly' and 'correctly'...