Author Topic: 'HISTORY' of the 'Silencer' that was used to inflict one of the shots to 'SC'...  (Read 147 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
Let's start here with 'what I perceive to be compelling evidence', proving that 'one of the two bullet wounds inflicted' into 'Sheila Caffells' neck region, that  'a Silencer was fitted to the barrel of the gun' which 'Cops' and lab' Experts 'failed to recognise'...

The proof is this ...

Most of the blood which poured out of the lower entry  wound in question (did so) as the flat surface of the silencer and the fleshy region immediately in the vicinity of that particular wound separated almost as quickly as when contact between both occurred - once the shot was fired, and infact whoever was involved in these overall circumstances of this episode, and the way in which 'Sheilas' death was treated as a suicide, when the dust eventually panned out !!!
« Last Edit: July 30, 2022, 08:13:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
With '100% certainty', the 'silencer' in question, 'was not the same' [one] that 'David Boutflour' claims that 'he had found' at 'the crime scene' on 'the 10th August  1985'.

But, 'it was not!
« Last Edit: July 30, 2022, 12:57:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
..The 'intended seizure' and 'recovery of that silencer' by 'DS Jones' must have given 'himself', cause for  'concern' since, 'he gasped out aloud' when 'Miller' gave him [those / these] instructions, [ by requesting ''DSJones'] to go on 'that very same day' [12th August 1985], to 'collect [it] the aforementioned 'SILENCER', from 'the 'Eaton' household, by [him] 'blurting out' , the following 'reactionary' sentence! He 'gasped out' in 'a totally unexpected fashion', and 'in' a somewhat 'uncredelous manner' [in response] to 'Millers' instruction' - 'WHAT SILENCER'?

'WHAT SILENCER'..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
'WHAT SILENCER' ?

'WHAT SILENCER' ??

'WHAT SILENCER' ???


'He  Said', in response to an instruction that /which was part and parcel of the duties he was expected to accept and comply with?

'Wny would' ( and  'he did' ) ''DS Jones' respond, in 'such a manner' to a request from a ' senior empowered employee in the same police force, who was, or whom may have been acting within the power and status of his career position, which comes with certain responsibilities, in / on the 'pretense', or 'otherwise', 'talking', 'speaking', 'instructing his workforce' (the workforce 'under his/her control')?
« Last Edit: August 01, 2022, 03:58:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865

'WHAT SILENCER' ?
'WHAT SILENCER' ??
'WHAT SILENCER' ???

'Why would' ( and  'he did' ) ''DS Jones' respond, in 'such a manner' to a request from a ' senior empowered employee in the same police force, who was, or whom may have been acting within the power and status of his career position, which comes with certain responsibilities, in / on the 'pretense', or 'otherwise', 'talking', 'speaking', 'instructing his workforce' (the workforce 'under his/her control')?

'What do you think'?
« Last Edit: August 01, 2022, 03:58:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
Because of 'officially disclosed police documentation', 'DS Jones' only thought that the silencer he collected [from] at the crime scene on the first morning ('7th August 1985') of the police operation (SC/688/85), existed from the scene - he was not aware by that stage that the. 22 semi-automatic rifle also had a silencer for that gun!
« Last Edit: August 01, 2022, 04:00:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
'Ds Jones' is  logged in, at the scene performing 'Informatives' with 'DI Cook' according to one version of a police radio message logs content , when he was supposed to still be at 'Jeremys cottage'!
« Last Edit: August 01, 2022, 05:01:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
'Ds Jones' is  logged in, at the scene performing 'Informatives' with 'DI Cook' according to one version of a police radio message logs content , when he was supposed to stillbe at Jeremys'cottage!

But, according to the contents of unsigned witness statements, 'DS Jones' was still at 'Jeremys cottage' and he supposedly was still there to enable himself to meet 'Ann Eaton' and 'Julie Mugford' who had travelled there, separately!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
'How' could 'DS Jones' be in two different places [the 'Crime scene' and at 'Jeremys cottage'], at 'one' and 'the same time'?
« Last Edit: August 01, 2022, 05:02:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
'How' could 'DS Jones' be in two different places [the 'Crime scene' and at 'Jeremys cottage'], at 'one' and 'the same time'?

In unsigned witness statements made in the name of 'DS Jones', it doesn't even make 'any mention' of 'DS Jones' leaving 'Jeremys  cottage' to go back to the scene! Additionally, in a police radio message log, it states that 'DS Jones' telephoned 'DC Clark' from the crime scene! But, why the need to telephone 'DC Clark' if they were both together at 'Jeremys  cottage'?
« Last Edit: August 01, 2022, 05:12:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
It was whilst 'DS Jones' was at the scene, with 'DI Cook' that he took possession of 'Anthony Pargeters' .22 bolt action rifle with its silencer fitted onto the end of the guns barrel! It was found and located in the downstairs bathroom/toilet. Before seizing it (them) he took photographs of the .22 bolt action rifle and its silencer there in that downstairs room. From there, he went into the kitchen and took a photograph of a fourth item 'in situ' there. Then he took the rifle with its silencer, and the camera with which he had taken three pictures by use of, and left the scene to return to ' Witham police station'. When he arrived back at 'DCI Jones office' there, he left the rifle with its silencer, and the camera with which he had taken three 'proof photographs' at the scene upon his 'senior officers office desk' [which was where 'DCI Jones' had 'told him to put it'...
« Last Edit: August 01, 2022, 05:33:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
These are the true circumstances regarding how the police came to be in possession of the very first silencer ( sometimes referred to, by the exhi it references 'SBJ/1' [lab' item number 22], 'SJ/1'[lab item number 22] and or 'DB/1'[lab item number 23]...
« Last Edit: August 01, 2022, 05:41:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
These are the true circumstances regarding how the police came to be in possession of the very first silencer ( sometimes referred to, by the exhi it references 'SBJ/1' [lab' item number 22], 'SJ/1'[lab item number 22] and or 'DB/1'[lab item number 23]...

This silencer 'SBJ/1'/'SJ/1', was only taken to ' Huntingdon Lab' once - which was on the '13th August 1985'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865
This silencer 'SBJ/1'/'SJ/1', was only taken to ' Huntingdon Lab' once - which was on the '13th August 1985'...

The reason why this / that silencer ['SBJ/1'/'SJ/1'] which ever exhibit reference you may choose for whatever reasons, 'it' was 'always going to be', and 'remain', lab' item 'no. 22'..

An item received at the lab' retains its lab' item  no. [22] which '[was received at lab' item(s) being 'referred to at a later date' , which has a lab' item number, of say '23', cannot be 'a reference to the 'same silencer' (22) received at the lab' previously. on the '13th August 1985',  and there exist good reason to support that which I will speak about [next]...
« Last Edit: August 01, 2022, 11:08:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50865


An item received at the lab' retains its lab' item  no. [22] which '[was received at lab' item(s) being 'referred to at a later date' , which has a lab' item number, of say '23', cannot be 'a reference to the 'same silencer' (22) received at the lab' previously. on the '13th August 1985',  and there exist good reason to support that which I will speak about [next]...

Such is the way that all lab' items are received at the lab' in sequential order, that it becomes an easy task to check and to make sure that evidence being relied upon in a prosecution  was received and dealt with correctly. I have to say [that in the instant case] that somebody has been tampering with the system, not only by attributing the reco ery, find and production to the lab' for examination, by assigning an item different exhibit references, but that an attempt has been made to try and conceal the wrong that has been applied, by going a step further and altering [the lab'] 'item number' for that exhibit!

But, they did not bargain for somebody like me, who has been through the same abominable practice, that cops, the cps, and in many instances, the judicial system chooses to pretend that nothing untoward has occurred ['BUT BELIEVE  ME IT DOES AND HAS  TAKEN PLACE]...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...