Yes,we understand about the sender and receiver and all that,but what I want explained is the VAST difference in the wording of the two logs.No one has addressed this to my satisfaction Lookout.Not West in his interview and not Killingeve.
To answer your question, there
isn't a vast difference in the wording of the two logs. You say there is, but this is not the case. Let me explain:
First of all Both logs convey the exact same message.
Here is Malcolm Bonnetts version of the message, as it appears on the form that he filled in - And just as a reminder it is this message that Jeremy Bamber
falsely says, comes from a phone call made by Nevill Bamber :
Subject: Daughter gone berserk
Mr Bamber
White House Farm
Tollshunt D'arcy
Daughter Sheila Bamber, aged 26 yrs has got hold of one of my guns.
Message passed to CD by the son of Mr Bamber, after the phone went(?) dead. Mr Bamber has a collection of shotguns and .410's
The above message contains the same information as that of PC West, but is written in the
first person, presumably to to avoid the whole thing descending into a game of Chinese whispers.
If you listen to Michael West's interview from the recent documentary, he says that Malcolm Bonnett has 'transposed' the message. And transposed just means - in this context - changed the format of the message.
More accurately, he's changed the grammatical structure, so that it reads in the first person, and he must have done it for reasons of clarity.
If you imagine how it would have happened at the time, Malcolm Bonnet would have received PC West's message, so what does he then write down?
If Malcolm Bonnet wrote down the events as they were being told to him by PC West, he would have had to have written something like:
PC West from Chelmsford station, said that Jeremy Bamber at Goldhanger Lane said that his father Nevill Bamber at Tollshunt D'arcy said that Jeremy Bambers sister, Nevill Bambers daughter, Sheila.....has gone crazy with a gun. There is no way that Malcolm Bonnett would or could have written the message in such a convoluted and confusing way.
The thing that is creating the emergency isn't PC West, and isn't Jeremy Bamber. It is Sheila with the gun.
By writing in the first person he removed all the extraneous stuff.
And then, to save any confusion, he wrote a little explanatory paragraph after the message.
And just to confirm, the explanatory paragraph being this...
Message passed to CD by the son of Mr Bamber, after the phone went(?) dead. Mr Bamber has a collection of shotguns and .410'sThe explanatory paragraph
proves that the message came originally from Jeremy Bamber, not Nevill Bamber.
And the contents of the sender box proves that Malcolm Bonnett received the message from PC West, not Nevill Bamber.
And that is why Malcolm Bonnett's message is different from PC West's message. But actually, in the end, not a vast difference, and something that can be easily explained.
But big evidence trumps small evidence. And the big evidence with these forms is contained in the 'sender' boxes. And the contents of those boxes alone, proves that Nevill did
not make any of those calls.
