The person seen running away a 2nd look

[Hartley]

Apparently the extra key in the shed or whatever, (I can't remember were it was kept now?) was missing from its usual place? Does anyone know if the key was in the lock on the inside of the door or not? Because I have read somewhere that the door was locked from the inside?

Yes a key was in the keyhole on inside, have a look at the firearms officers statements, I forget which one now, maybe Collins.

[Hartley]

Yes a key was in the keyhole on inside, have a look at the firearms officers statements, I forget which one now, maybe Collins.

Actually it is in Delgados statement:
 http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1629.msg0.html#new

[andrea]

youre quick at finding statements Harts. Takes me ages finding anything on here.

[Hartley]

youre quick at finding statements Harts. Takes me ages finding anything on here.

I'm struggling to find Collins statements though  It is arguably the most important of the firearms teams statements yet it is missing from the forum, or it at least appears to be. 

[mertol22]

I am inclined to agree with you. I was just about to comment to that effect when I saw your post.
If indeed there was a hunched up figure seen walking away, could I say that whoever thought that up had probably been watching the movie "The Fugitive" the previous night and got it muddled in their mind so they thought it was real.
Could I suggest that if the police had taken it seriously they would most certainly have made serious enquiries into it?

interseting Grahame in your last sentence i see if the police had taken things seriously, are you leaning to the police sitting on the roof with the i was here  charade ?

[grahameb]

interseting Grahame in your last sentence i see if the police had taken things seriously, are you leaning to the police sitting on the roof with the i was here  charade ?

Oh yes. The amount of information that had not been disclosed at the time of the trial was phenomenal. The fact that so much was not disclosed should have been enough to invite a full investigation into the untoward activities of the police in my opinion?

[mertol22]

I figured that was the incline,  very selective evidence comes to mind for the trial. All planned and agreed well before hand of course.

[smiffy]

Apparently the extra key in the shed or whatever, (I can't remember were it was kept now?) was missing from its usual place? Does anyone know if the key was in the lock on the inside of the door or not? Because I have read somewhere that the door was locked from the inside?

Going to be picky here as Grahame's post may mislead people due to bad wording.
Grahame refers to "the key was in the lock" .
People may wrongly get the impession this was the spare key talked about when it was not.
Grahame should have stated "a key was in the lock".
People need to be careful not to change evidence or incorrectly report it in a way that may inadvertently or otherwise mislead people.

[grahameb]

Going to be picky here as Grahame's post may mislead people due to bad wording.
Grahame refers to "the key was in the lock" .
People may wrongly get the impession this was the spare key talked about when it was not.
Grahame should have stated "a key was in the lock".
People need to be careful not to change evidence or incorrectly report it in a way that may inadvertently or otherwise mislead people.

Oh dear! I might have inadvertently have changed everybody's mind about Jeremy? God forbid. After all I'm only man with a bad memory.

[mike tesko]

Oh dear! I might have inadvertently have changed everybody's mind about Jeremy? God forbid. After all I'm only man with a bad memory.

There would have been two keys, one that would normally be in the lock at night, and the other spare key kept outside - one key in lock, and other key missing (never recovered), I don't think what Grahame said can be misconstrued, since there would always have been a key in the lock that was normally in the lock on the inside of the door, with bolts applied also...

[vidvic]

Going to be picky here as Grahame's post may mislead people due to bad wording.
Grahame refers to "the key was in the lock" .
People may wrongly get the impession this was the spare key talked about when it was not.
Grahame should have stated "a key was in the lock".
People need to be careful not to change evidence or incorrectly report it in a way that may inadvertently or otherwise mislead people.

That's funny.......