Author Topic: Sensational 'twist in blood type results' that were found on nightdress [`ND/3']  (Read 5615 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
There would have been minimum GSR from a comparatively new rifle anyway, even after as many shots which were fired.

guest29835

  • Guest
Didn't it later come to light, that the item was only examined visually?  What's the betting that this visual examination, (which for the purposes of EP served for an examination) was actually preceded by a proper examination, the results of which were / are contradictory to to the findings of the visual examination?

Exactly.  The garment was only tested for blood.  I've now said it three times. 

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44381
Didn't it later come to light, that the item was only examined visually?  What's the betting that this visual examination, (which for the purposes of EP served for an examination) was actually preceded by a proper examination, the results of which were / are contradictory to to the findings of the visual examination?

You know you need to provide a source Roch.

I have never read this before.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2022, 03:01:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

guest29835

  • Guest
No evidence on Sheila's hands, fingers, nails, body, face & nightdress confirms Bamber as the killer.

Supporters counter this in different ways -

JackieD posts about Julie identifying the twins.

Lookout posts about her gut feeling.

Rob posts about the nightdress being disposed 11 years after the masacre.

QC says if the police had waited until  2022 for a trial there will be more reasonable doubt.

Snow66! says Bamber would have crashed into things in the twins bedroom & woken everyone up.

Plenty of scope for reasonable doubt in this case. 

Adam counters this in different ways -

The supper reconnaissance - likes to mention this a lot.

His gut feeling.

Ignoring points made by doubters and supporters that cast a different light on the evidence. 

Just repeats the same points over and over again and hopes nobody notices. 

Posting lots of lists of irrelevant things.

When caught out, denies he said the thing he was caught out on.  Demands that you post up when he said it, then when it is posted up, he insults you.

Claims he doesn't insult anybody, then insults somebody, then pretends he hasn't.

Misrepresents the views and stances of people he disagrees with - see his post above.

Demands other members are banned if they disagree with him.

He's started so may as well carry on.

Gives moral support to wavering members like QC via the PM system.  A prestigious role.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44381





Didn't Stan Jones say that he had a " gut-feeling " that JB was guilty ?
Well I have the same " gut-feeling " about JB's innocence !

Good for you.

Stan Jones backed up his gut feeling with evidence.

'Stan Jones' was the cause of the ill feeling between 'DCI Jones' and 'himself'.

With the benefit of hindsite, he returned to the crime scene from 'Jeremys' cottage, intent on seizing the silencer that 'Jeremy had just been talking about! He made the mistake of wrongly assuming that there was only one silencer somewhere at the scene, and that it belonged to the rifle that' Jeremy' said he had left on a wooden settle in the back hallway. The door entrance to the downstairs bathroom and toilet, was close to where the wooden settle stood. He went toward the bathroom entrance and looked around. There were several weapons leaning against the wall, and a number of firearm accessories, including a Parker hale sound moderator [silencer], numerous boxes of .22 rim fire ammunition. He took possession of the silencer that would attract the exhibit reference of 'SBJ/1'.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2022, 05:28:PM by mike tesko »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Good for you.

Stan Jones backed up his gut feeling with evidence.





What " evidence " would that have been ?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
It took a year before a case was cobbled together using hearsay and character assassination.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
It took a year before a case was cobbled together using hearsay and character assassination.
You'r right, 'lookout' [`Oh', 'what a tangled web we weave' when 'we fist practice to decieve']...

'The signed exhibit labels' bearing 'signatures', are 'FAKE'
« Last Edit: April 06, 2022, 09:03:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...