Sheilas Two Shots

[snow66!]

Going by the forensic & circumstantial evidence, it has to be said that Sheila was easy to control.

Forensic: -

She was on Haloperidol.

There is no evidence Sheila put up any resistance.

It was late at night/early morning. Sheila would be drowsy.

Bamber was much stronger.


Circumstantial:-

Pamela Boutflours WS.

Bamber saw Sheila earlier while working.

Bamber saw Sheila at WHF during his reconnaisance.

Bamber was so excited at Sheila's condition, he rang Julie as soon as he got home.

The massacre was carried out, around 3 hours later.

Well i dont know where to start Adam,its the same stuff.We know she was on Haloperidol,but have no idea what the effects of the reduced dose at that time would have been,or if she was taking her procyclidene tablets to counteract them.Sheila would not put up any resistance if she was the one pulling the trigger.Late night/early morning,ANYONE can be drowsy,till they full wake up.Bamber being stronger suggests Sheila being manhandledwhich would leave tell tale bruises.Pamela Boutflour only spoke of Sheila acting oddly,and having an intended discussion about her with June,nothing else.The lack of interest in conversation over the phone could easily have been down to depression,not sedation.Bamber looking at Sheila does not tell him how sedated she was,he simply said she did not join in with the conversation with their parents.Bamber was SO EXCITED he phoned Julie,i dont think i have heard that one from you before Adam.

[snow66!]

Hello guests and casual browsers,and welcome to the Jeremy Bamber Forum.As you can see everyone else has been banned for unacceptable behaviour.The Administrators and myself will be meeting sometime next week to see if we feel any can re-join.So, untill we get some new members,or we decide to reinstate some,whatever i say goes.As it happens i have decided JB is innocent and will be phoning the home secretary tomorrow.Anyway,as well as the forum rules,the Administrators are printing a new guide on how to behave on an online discussion forum.It will be based on the exemplary behaviour of myself -Snow66-and it is reccomended that all banned members read it carefuly before attemping to re-join.Bye for now all!

[snow66!]

I have been PM,d by most of the banned members begging for mercy.I have not responded to any of them,but will make a statement here.All i can say is i will ask the Administrators to be as merciful as possible.But as for the members who told the Administrators to shove their forum up their Jacksie,and the like,i wouldnt hold out much hope.

[snow66!]

Cambridge Cutie has just PM,d me again saying she will not try to re-join.She has decided to take the oppertunity to go back to her calling,which was never far from her thoughts.The Mother Superior of her convent got in touch with her recently, offering her a second chance,and this ban has made up her mind.The thought of a new Habit was just too irresistable.Good luck Cutie!

[snow66!]

Adam has just PM,d me again,hes in a terrible state.Please,please let me re-join he pleads,the forum is my whole life! I told him,you should have thought about that before you told the Administrators to bend over and kiss their own a****

[snow66!]

Jings,Mike has just PM,d me.He has been offered a one way trip to the inner earth[Agartha] by the Aliens,which he has accepted.Mike has decided to hand over all the files and documents he has on JB to myself.He has also decided to appoint me chief Administratot.Thanks Mike,and good luck with your new home!

[snow66!]

Hello everyone,i am the new chief Administrator,and as such ,have decided to reinstate all banned members.But you better watch your ps and qs.Do you hear? Just watch it.

[Steve_uk]

Hello everyone,i am the new chief Administrator,and as such ,have decided to reinstate all banned members.But you better watch your ps and qs.Do you hear? Just watch it.

Well when you've rounded up all the lost sheep please let me know..

[mike tesko]

Hello everyone,i am the new chief Administrator,and as such ,have decided to reinstate all banned members.But you better watch your ps and qs.Do you hear? Just watch it.

[lookout]

I like that Mike 

[killingeve]

I have been distracted by events in Ukraine.

I suspected Gascoigne was QC when they posted on the Russia thread.

NaughtyNun received a lifetime ban yet is still posting on here as Cambridgecutie. NGB has more or less opened the floodgate by knowingly letting a banned user troll the forum. Its only going to make other banned users know they can do the same.

If I received a lifetime ban then how come I'm still here?  How do you know what conversations may have taken place during the cold war era behind the iron curtain? And if I had other accounts here how do you know the offer wasn't made to link any such dormant accounts?  How do you know any ban wasn't orchestrated to infiltrate 'enemy' territory and/or any claims made elsewhere were said for effect?  You don't do you?  As usual you don't have a clue. 

And there's a world of difference with regard to teasing other posters about belonging to a 'knitting club'
and telling the moderator to 'go suck dick'.

If you suspected that QC and Gascoigne are one and the same I am surprised you were not as vocal as you usually are on the open forum along with telling tales to the moderators eg Lemonhead, RJ and CC.  You take the term snake in the grass to another level.   

[killingeve]

You are in no position to judge who should or shouldn't be banned.

Neither are you!  Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!  You constantly goad and troll others under the cloak of 'banter' but overstepped the mark recently when you extended your goading and trolling to pm's which NBG put a stop to.  I have recently received an unsolicited pm from a moderator asking if I mind you goading me about my drinking habits.  If the moderation was consistent you would have received numerous temporary bans leading to a permanent ban.

[Roch]

Neither are you!  Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!  You constantly goad and troll others under the cloak of 'banter' but overstepped the mark recently when you extended your goading and trolling to pm's which NBG put a stop to.  I have recently received an unsolicited pm from a moderator asking if I mind you goading me about my drinking habits.  If the moderation was consistent you would have received numerous temporary bans leading to a permanent ban.

I sense that the forum would prefer it if David moved on from making such remarks. Your return to the forum wasn't the smoothest of transitions and I had a part to play in that, which I could have handled better. However, the manner in which you went about your return did seem at times deliberately aimed at getting members' backs up. 

[David1819]

I sense that the forum would prefer it if David moved on from making such remarks. Your return to the forum wasn't the smoothest of transitions and I had a part to play in that, which I could have handled better. However, the manner in which you went about your return did seem at times deliberately aimed at getting members' backs up.

If a user decides to broadcast their drinking habits on an internet forum, then other people can talk about it. You reap what you sow.

Moreover, other forum users need to be made aware they are potentially wasting their time by debating with someone who is drunk. This is a true crime discussion forum, not a place to spend your evening piss up.

[Roch]

If a user decides to broadcast their drinking habits on an internet forum, then other people can talk about it. Your reap what you sow.

Moreover other forum users need to made aware they are potentially wasting their time by debating with someone who is drunk. This is a true crime discussion forum, not a place to spend your evening piss up.

If CC was as you claim, I doubt she would seem as compos mentis as she does. It would be preferable if you dropped this line of approach when posting in response to her. You are both very case knowledgeable, so why not concentrate on debate?