Sheilas Two Shots

[Adam]

Until his re ban, at least Gascoigne won't abuse posters as before. Saying 'thanks Adam' & being abusive to Steve & NGB.

He's already rubbing the forum's nose in it enough by rejoining days after a permanant ban.

[Adam]

Supporters will be pleased QC is back. At least his posts are very long which gives the impression they are saying something.

Snow66!'s struggled a lot as the sole supporter on here.

David won't be all over QC as he was with Holly & RJ. QC's 98% guilty is better than nothing.

[Roch]

Adam, over the years you've come pretty close getting several bans yourself, TBF.

[snow66!]

Supporters will be pleased QC is back. At least his posts are very long which gives the impression they are saying something.

Snow66!'s struggled a lot as the sole supporter on here.

David won't be all over QC as he was with Holly & RJ. QC's 98% guilty is better than nothing.

I am reasonable doubt Adam.I am merely going through the available evidence at the moment,But nothing i have seen draws me any nearer to guilt,at the moment.

[snow66!]

Things like withheld douments under PII and the destroying of evidence just before they coould be DNA tested are big issues.IF everything was above board there would be no need for any of this.The destroying of evidence wasnt even investigated,the  ccrc or whoever it was simply said there was no need for any enquiry because they might rule in JBs favour regarding any evidence.Well it hasnt helped him up till now.And those who destroyed the crucial evidence got off scot free.And of course there is no convincing scenario as to how JB dealt with Sheila.Not to my satisfaction anyway.

[snow66!]

And as i said,the statements are contrived.Ferguson said in one statement that Sheila would not have commited suicide because she was in GOOD SPIRITS.yet he has her over medicated.If she was in good spirits,why did she give up so easily and accept death.To be quite honest the more you read the statements and notice all the contradictions,the more they loose any ring of truth.

[snow66!]

And of course the conversation with someone in the farm,and the two bodies in the kitchen have never been discredited satisfactorily.The police log read-ARE in coversation with someone--wouldnt it be more straight forward to say police are TRYING to contact anyone,if that is what they meant.Again,very suspicious,with no adequate explanation.

[Adam]

Adam, over the years you've come pretty close getting several bans yourself, TBF.

Can you confirm the forums rules on permanantly banned posters returning a few days later.

QC's permanant ban was supported by posters on here. Even Bamber supporters did not dispute it.

I have received PM's overnight supporting the re ban of QC as well as PM's when he was posting as QC.

If he keeps resurfacing he just needs to be re banned. It only takes a click of a button. He will eventually give up. There are other places he can post.

Scipio was re banned after a return attempt. And he was a popular poster.

It will be a great pity if the forum is destroyed again.

Thank you.

[Roch]

Can you confirm the forums rules on permanantly banned posters returning a few days later.

QC's permanant ban was supported by posters on here. Even Bamber supporters did not dispute it.

I have received PM's overnight supporting the re ban of QC as well as PM's when he was posting as QC.

If he keeps resurfacing he just needs to be re banned. It only takes a click of a button. He will eventually give up. There are other places he can post.

Scipio was re banned after a return attempt. And he was a popular poster.

It will be a great pity if the forum is destroyed again.

Thank you.

I will explain precedent to you very clearly when I get the chance. I have just deleted my original reply by pressing the wrong button on the phone.

[Adam]

I will explain precedent to you very clearly when I get the chance. I have just deleted my original reply by pressing the wrong button on the phone.

Thanks. The forum needs consistancy on whether permanantly banned posters can re surface a few days later.

Scipio, a guilter couldn't. QC, a supporter, at present can. Despite forum opposition .

A posters stance should not be an issue regarding forum rules. 

[Roch]

Thanks. The forum needs consistancy on whether petmanantly banned posters can re surface a few days later.

Scipio, a guilter couldn't. QC, a supporter, at present can. Despite forum opposition .

A posters stance should not be an issue regarding forum rules.

As already stated, I will explain precedent clearly to you. But not until I get the chance.

[killingeve]

Is there any possibility you could break your posts up into paragraphs, as I have done above?  I don't mind long posts, but if you post without paragraphs it makes it very difficult to read, which is a shame.

Dr. Vanezis believed that the first shot to Sheila was when she was sitting up slightly.  It is entirely possible that Jeremy first shot her while forcing her on the floor - assuming he is guilty.  You mention Sheila being 'frozen'.  I assume this is metaphorical but I'm not sure what you mean exactly.  To position Sheila, she had to be moved, which means she had to move, which means she wasn't frozen in any sense.  If you mean what Ainsley said in the DPP Report, that she 'froze', well this was the Essex Police explanation for how Jeremy managed to manhandle Sheila, but if you think about it for five seconds, it doesn't make any sense unless we're saying that Sheila was already in the main bedroom and Jeremy quickly pinned her on the floor (perhaps shooting her too early in the process, hence Dr. Vanezis' evidence).

If you have not done so already, one thing I recommend you do is look at the analysis of the evidence of Martyn Ismail and Dr. Peter Vanezis in the 2002 appeal judgment.  I think the judges' analysis was mistaken and they were wrong to accept Mr Ismail's evidence, but it's still important to read it.

QC also had an aversion to snow66!'s lack of formatting.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11038.msg511805.html#msg511805

 

[killingeve]

As already stated, I will explain precedent clearly to you. But not until I get the chance.

Will pm you.

[David1819]

Surprised David didn't notice QC has returned. Maybe he just notices guilters.

Anyway, Scipio was banned after a quick return attempt. QC has attempted a quick return so the same action should be taken. Maybe he's aware NGB is currently not around.

Other moderators need to step in. QC will only go back to normal once he gets more confident, which resulted in 3 bans in quick succession. One permanant.

I have been distracted by events in Ukraine.

I suspected Gascoigne was QC when they posted on the Russia thread.

NaughtyNun received a lifetime ban yet is still posting on here as Cambridgecutie. NGB has more or less opened the floodgate by knowingly letting a banned user troll the forum. Its only going to make other banned users know they can do the same.

[killingeve]

I have been distracted by events in Ukraine.

I suspected Gascoigne was QC when they posted on the Russia thread.

NaughtyNun received a lifetime ban yet is still posting on here as Cambridgecutie. NGB has more or less opened the floodgate by knowingly letting a banned user troll the forum. Its only going to make other banned users know they can do the same.

NaughtyNun didn't receive a lifetime ban.  She received a week long ban and returned here 7 years later.