I do not understand why I am answering this painfully puerile post. You haven't even read my original post which explains why he may not have been in close contact with her all day. You even seem to have forgotten my previous posts. He did not get lucky. There was other unidentified DNA found and that was not removed by the conditions and I think it natural that a 14 year old boy would not wish to return to the dead body of his girlfriend.
The rest is just a rehash of other ideas which have no evidential value. You are just telling a story that suits your position on the case.
I am merely a neutral armchair detective on here, posting an opinion based on info I’ve gleaned from SL’s IB, various message boards that discuss the case and official online documents from Scottish Courts. The Scottish courts documents, though useful and accurate, are only brief summaries of the case; the original trial was, for many years, the longest ever trial of a single-accused in Scottish legal history and was a very complex circumstantial case that nobody on the planet knows a great deal about, with the exception of a couple of people. Everybody else, yourself included, Bubo bubo, is merely left to speculate, infer and formulate theories based on the limited info that is avaliable in the public domain about the case. So, essentially, no one on this forum, or anywhere in the world, for that matter, is qualified to answer questions on this case. Even the individuals best placed and best qualified to pass judgement on the case — Judge Lord Nimmo Smith, Alan Turnbull and Donald Findlay — aren’t, strictly speaking, ever going to be 100% certain it was LM who did it, since it was a purely circumstantial case (they may all be 98/99% sure it was him, but they can never be 100% sure). The only way we’ll ever know is if the killer confesses, and, imo, LM is the killer. He may well be innocent, but I’d be extremely surprised — incredulous, even — if he was innocent. For the circumstantial evidence against him was overwhelming, imo.
Anyway, which original post are you referring to? Why should I read all of your posts? Who are you? I’m too busy to read all of your posts. I post from an iphone, which obviously takes longer than a tablet, laptop, pc, etc. Unidentified profiles?? Jodi was in a woodland which was frequented by loads of youths who drank and smoked cannabis, young courting couples having sex, drug dealers, dog walkers, etc, etc. Of course there would be innocently transferred unidentified profiles; it was inevitable. There were enough partial profiles and markers from LM to the extent he could not be ruled out as a donor of the dna found on Jodi’s clothing. I think it natural that a 14 year old boy would not wish to return to the dead body of his girlfriend? Sure, but we’ve highlighted many times on many forums that LM was not a normal teenager, and nor was he traumatised. For example, he was calm at the locus, emotionless on the phone to police and emergency services when telling them about the body, was texting away casually on his phone at the locus just after finding the body (as noted by the ambulance crew and police), didn’t reach out to his family upon the discovery of the body, was completely emotionless during the sky interview, was at jodi’s graveside with a new girlfriend on the day of the funeral, watched a violent and graphic marilyn manson dvd just days after jodi’s death, wanted to be back at school immediately, swaggering around town living off his notoriety during the investigation, goading police during interviews (a senior social worker noted that at no point did he have to intervene during his police interrogations as lm held his own and gave as good as he got; cd was astonished at how easily lm took control of the police interviews and interrogations, despite never being involved in the legal process before).
