Something wrong with way tests carried out at lab, using additional silencers?
Tests were carried out at the Lab' using four identical silencers, which were fed with samples of blood and then the silencers were test fired - results of blood that was present at the time of tests firing, indicated that there was no effect upon the make up of the blood no matter how many shots were subsequently fired through it - but these tests were rigged and the results wrongly used to suggest that the blood found in the silencer would not be contaminated by firearms residue inside the baffle plates and tubing of the "Bamber" silencer?
Lets get the facts right about what they did to "rig these tests" and the results with the intention of bolstering up the prosecutions case:-
(1) they obtained four identical or similar silencers, and cleansed them thoroughly so that there was no contaminants inside the silencers, into which they then dripped blood from two volunteers. These silencers were then fitted to the barrel of the Bamber rifle and test fired using control ammunition, and the blood was then checked to see if it was altered in any way?
(2) these tests proved that none of the blood from the volunteers had been altered or effected in any way as a result of these tests...
(3) Yet, blood found in silencer that was used to prosecute Jeremy Bamber, was found inside a silencer which was heavily contaminated with firearms residue and other contaminants, and therefore, the results obtained from the tests at the Lab' involving the volunteers, was misleading and dishonest. If the Bamber silencer was the silencer inside which was found the blood from Sheila Caffell, then because it was heavily contaminated with firearms residue, any blood that got inside the silencer from Sheila or any of the other victims during the shootings, would almost certainly have been contaminated with traces of firearms residue, but as far as is known, the blood which has been attributed to the Bamber silencer / Sheila Caffell, was not contaminated with firearms residue at all - rasing further questions about the authenticity of the blood group evidence, that was introduced and relied upon to support the prosecutions case?
