There is a problem/fault with the original thread which is being investigated.
I have created this thread as a stop gap. They can be merged later.
It seems to me that we
need more local knowledge and case data to explore this aspect fully.
The path to the North would also lead to Newbattle but appears longer. Based on the PI’s discussion in the Channel 5 video it seems you can exit the woods from behind the wall but this leads to open fields and pasture. Why start on that path then go across the fields towards the ’v’? Is this a shorter route?
Unless she was attacked within those woods it would require moving her body a considerable distance to get to where she was found. The pathologist said the body could have been moved but nothing about distance. I think he also said that the mutilation may have been after death.
I also feel that if she had stumbled into a drug swap/meet situation she would not be mutilated as found, especially the tying up of her arms behind her back, removal of clothing, etc. I can see her being stabbed to ‘shut her up’ but the attack is too brutal for such a situation IMO.
As far as going through/over the ‘v’ it cannot be that difficult, all the search party went through I believe. Again
local knowledge required.Then there is the blood issue. I think I am right in saying that blood was found on the wall by the ‘v’. It would be useful to know its precise location. We also need to know what form it took. Was it drops, splashes, runs or smears.
Case information we do not have is needed. Was it on both sides or just the path side? The fact that it rained does not help but there may be some clues in what we do know.
If it is smears there is a strong case for it being transferred. This could have been done by the search party and the dog. Equally smears could be caused by someone moving her body through the ‘v’ to hide it.
PERHAPS ROAD RUNNER CAN ANSWER SOME OF THESE POINTS.