You're saying that if we ring police to tell them about an incident occurring elsewhere, they'll say "Thank-you, Sir/Madam" and put the phone down???!!!
I think the CT has gathered to it those who believe JB innocent without knowing why. All they really want to hear is others sharing their belief without challenge it, ergo it's unnecessary to ask questions/look closer. I HAVE been there.
I think that's what they honestly believed yes!
As I have said before, you only have to say "police corruption" and some will jump fully on board without hearing another word. I think it's good for those maintaining innocence to have support but there is a fine line between support and enabling false hope and impossible expectations.
Roch made the point that the CT should have an in house sceptic and he's right but how would that work when Yvonne et al have apparently convinced themselves that their improbable theories are proven fact?
