Author Topic: Are Assertions Of Sheila's Violence Founded?  (Read 1482 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Munksa

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 505
Re: Are Assertions Of Sheila's Violence Founded?
« Reply #15 on: January 05, 2022, 04:44:PM »




JB hadn't known very much about schizophrenia the same as it's not fully known about in the world of the mentally ill. His knowledge came from reading books about it while in prison. Initially it was just a word which was bandied about, to him without any depth of meaning.

I've pretty well answered why Sheila was violent. And I think everyone knows about her punching walls ----which isn't normal, for a woman in any case, besides putting her hand through plate glass .

Talking about him any knowledge of Sheila bring violent , not her Schizophrenia

Who said punching walls isnt normal for women in ANY case? Ah but here you go Lookout, she wasn't in normal case/state , was she? t was during one of her episode!

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13798
Re: Are Assertions Of Sheila's Violence Founded?
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2022, 04:52:PM »
Assertions like this?

I'm inclined to see Sheila in an almost blind trance, having the strength of Goliath, but not seeing who she's attacking or firing at., but what the sequence might have been, I'm not able to say.......and like all other suggestions, it's only a theory.

 :-\

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Are Assertions Of Sheila's Violence Founded?
« Reply #17 on: January 05, 2022, 05:03:PM »
Assertions like this?

 :-\




That's more like it. Delusions and hallucinations are part of the illness.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Are Assertions Of Sheila's Violence Founded?
« Reply #18 on: January 05, 2022, 05:05:PM »
Oh heck, I've just noticed the year  ;D I wondered what was going on  :)) :)) :)) :)). Ooooops.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13798
Re: Are Assertions Of Sheila's Violence Founded?
« Reply #19 on: January 05, 2022, 05:08:PM »
Oh heck, I've just noticed the year  ;D I wondered what was going on  :)) :)) :)) :)). Ooooops.

Jane once had a very factually coherent view on this case. But that all changed when Caroline had an "exchange of ideas" with the "honest and honourable" Paul Harrison.  :(

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Are Assertions Of Sheila's Violence Founded?
« Reply #20 on: January 05, 2022, 05:13:PM »
Jane once had a very factually coherent view on this case. But that all changed when Caroline had an "exchange of ideas" with the "honest and honourable" Paul Harrison.  :(






Things could change soon, you never know. ;D

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13798
Re: Are Assertions Of Sheila's Violence Founded?
« Reply #21 on: January 05, 2022, 05:16:PM »


Things could change soon, you never know. ;D

How long do you recon Jane would last as a guilter should Caroline publicly come to her senses?

20 minutes? maybe even half and hour?  ;D

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21170
Re: Are Assertions Of Sheila's Violence Founded?
« Reply #22 on: January 05, 2022, 05:18:PM »
How long do you recon Jane would last as a guilter should Caroline publicly come to her senses?

20 minutes? maybe even half and hour?  ;D
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/353440-when-the-facts-change-i-change-my-mind---what

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Are Assertions Of Sheila's Violence Founded?
« Reply #23 on: January 05, 2022, 05:42:PM »
How long do you recon Jane would last as a guilter should Caroline publicly come to her senses?

20 minutes? maybe even half and hour?  ;D





Oooh whatever the outcome, a guilter will remain a guilter.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Are Assertions Of Sheila's Violence Founded?
« Reply #24 on: January 05, 2022, 05:45:PM »




Oooh whatever the outcome, a guilter will remain a guilter.

2 minutes
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000