Author Topic: Counting Conspiracies.  (Read 10901 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #75 on: January 05, 2022, 02:29:PM »

Jackie.......................................SHUT UP............................or learn how to debate


I am taking screen shots of all your posts making personal threat or slurs about me.  Your low intelligence shows because you cannot control your self by constantly making personal slurs on forum members

Do you think you are above the law???? A solicitor will have a field day with your attacks and slurs

YOU have not got the intelligence to debate properly without personal slurs
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Munksa

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 505
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #76 on: January 05, 2022, 02:31:PM »
You are a vile, disgusting sexual deviant and a sad and lonely women

Your positive ?
you'd prefer to believe ?

You have been warned if you keep making these serious slurs online you will get prosecuted
There are laws against people like you and I will not put up with these serious slurs.  I am going to send your posts to a lady solicitor who deals with online abuse and you had better have proof of everything you have written

 men have needs

What has this got anything to do with the case apart from attacking me

You need phycological  help writing this

😂😂😂

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33775
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #77 on: January 05, 2022, 02:33:PM »

I am taking screen shots of all your posts making personal threat or slurs about me.  Your low intelligence shows because you cannot control your self by constantly making personal slurs on forum members

Do you think you are above the law???? A solicitor will have a field day with your attacks and slurs

YOU have not got the intelligence to debate properly without personal slurs


Jackie................................................SHUT UP........................................................

Offline Armchair Detective

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 541
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #78 on: January 05, 2022, 02:34:PM »
One cannot escape the thought that, for the most part, your intention is not simply to play devil's advocate, but to aggressively argue, lengthily, against whatever was posted last.

Precisely. And if I respond it will be followed by another half million words and another until I give up and he thinks he has proven his superior intellect so I'm saving time and effort by just ignoring him.
"When ignorant folks want to advertise their ignorance, you don't really have to do anything, just let them talk" - Barack Obama

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #79 on: January 05, 2022, 02:34:PM »

Jackie.......................................SHUT UP............................or learn how to debate


1. What is online harassment?

Online harassment is not defined in UK law, but recognised behaviour includes offensive, abusive, violent, threatening, racist or explicit online content, which is designed to cause alarm or distress. For behaviour to constitute "harassment" it must take place on at least two occasions. Generally, a perpetrator’s conduct can be considered "harassment" (rather than being simply unpleasant) where it includes more than one episode of unreasonable and oppressive behaviour which is calculated to result in alarm, fear or distress to the victim.

Online harassment can take place on multiple platforms including email, instant messaging, social media sites, blogs and chat rooms. It often involves bullying or "trolling" an individual or organisation. It can also include identity theft and posting false profiles in an individual’s name. Because online content can go viral very quickly, it is easy for harassment to escalate if you do not take prompt action against it.
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Munksa

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 505
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #80 on: January 05, 2022, 02:36:PM »

I am taking screen shots of all your posts making personal threat or slurs about me.  Your low intelligence shows because you cannot control your self by constantly making personal slurs on forum members

Do you think you are above the law???? A solicitor will have a field day with your attacks and slurs

YOU have not got the intelligence to debate properly without personal slurs
[/i][/b]

Jackie but YOU are the one who keeps bringing Jeremy's sex in prison on every post and topic ? You did here too when no one has mentioned. In fact you do it on every post? So who is obsessed?

I love the threats? Why just say it  here and waste your time? You have warned and threatened  Jane many times,  why not just do it. Go on, I dare you ...come on Jackie show it.

Offline Armchair Detective

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 541
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #81 on: January 05, 2022, 02:38:PM »

You have NO idea if JB is gay bi or heterosexual. But guilters like to slur him as if being gay is a bad thing

Do not try to pretend you know JB’s sex life was or is because it makes no difference to his guilt or innocence

Yes but did he date rape the girl from the Chequers who woke up to find him on top of her?
"When ignorant folks want to advertise their ignorance, you don't really have to do anything, just let them talk" - Barack Obama

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33775
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #82 on: January 05, 2022, 02:40:PM »
Precisely. And if I respond it will be followed by another half million words and another until I give up and he thinks he has proven his superior intellect so I'm saving time and effort by just ignoring him.


I imagine such may have been his plan from the start. He gets away with it by playing the uncertainty card, but what's perfectly obvious is that he can't, civilly, cope with any of his arguments countered, so hits out at the poster and complains to the moderator.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33775
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #83 on: January 05, 2022, 02:42:PM »
Yes but did he date rape the girl from the Chequers who woke up to find him on top of her?


Oooh! Careful!! You'll be the next to get "pervert" hurled at you.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #84 on: January 05, 2022, 02:44:PM »
[/i][/b]

Jackie but YOU are the one who keeps bringing Jeremy's sex in prison on every post and topic ? You did here too when no one has mentioned. In fact you do it on every post? So who is obsessed?

I love the threats? Why just say it  here and waste your time? You have warned and threatened  Jane many times,  why not just do it. Go on, I dare you ...come on Jackie show it.


No you are a liar. You bought up the subject. I am responding because like all the other myths on here it will not be true.  There is no proof so why even bring the subject up.  Its ridiculous and probably only bought up to try and get JB in trouble.
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #85 on: January 05, 2022, 02:46:PM »
Precisely. And if I respond it will be followed by another half million words and another until I give up and he thinks he has proven his superior intellect so I'm saving time and effort by just ignoring him.


To be fair his superior intellect is obvious
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #86 on: January 05, 2022, 02:47:PM »
Yes but did he date rape the girl from the Chequers who woke up to find him on top of her?


Please post the proof or is it another story
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Armchair Detective

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 541
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #87 on: January 05, 2022, 02:51:PM »

I imagine such may have been his plan from the start. He gets away with it by playing the uncertainty card, but what's perfectly obvious is that he can't, civilly, cope with any of his arguments countered, so hits out at the poster and complains to the moderator.

I have observed this from a distance and have been embarrassed on his behalf on a number of occasions. He clearly has the ability to be so much better too.

Remember when he flounced off just after his ban, vowing never to grace the forum with his golden intellect ever again?   :)) 
"When ignorant folks want to advertise their ignorance, you don't really have to do anything, just let them talk" - Barack Obama

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33775
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #88 on: January 05, 2022, 02:53:PM »

1. What is online harassment?

Online harassment is not defined in UK law, but recognised behaviour includes offensive, abusive, violent, threatening, racist or explicit online content, which is designed to cause alarm or distress. For behaviour to constitute "harassment" it must take place on at least two occasions. Generally, a perpetrator’s conduct can be considered "harassment" (rather than being simply unpleasant) where it includes more than one episode of unreasonable and oppressive behaviour which is calculated to result in alarm, fear or distress to the victim.[/

Online harassment can take place on multiple platforms including email, instant messaging, social media sites, blogs and chat rooms. It often involves bullying or "trolling" an individual or organisation. It can also include identity theft and posting false profiles in an individual’s name. Because online content can go viral very quickly, it is easy for harassment to escalate if you do not take prompt action against it.



What is online harassment?


An art Jackie has been practicing since long before I joined this Forum. Probably the reason she's received life bans from other forums, and possibly the reason she has previously been banned from this one. I think these facts speak for themselves.

Offline Munksa

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 505
Re: Counting Conspiracies.
« Reply #89 on: January 05, 2022, 02:57:PM »

No you are a liar. You bought up the subject. I am responding because like all the other myths on here it will not be true.  There is no proof so why even bring the subject up.  Its ridiculous and probably only bought up to try and get JB in trouble.

Eh???? I DID NOT you are a lying monstrosity here, no shame. If you can lie so openly and  blatantly God knows what else you are capable of! Go Sue me too , waiting for the Lady solicitor's letter to get summoned . Hurry hurry Jackie, run .

You keep lying so much you don't know what you
are saying.