The Last Christmas

[David1819]

There was a case in the US where the defence got a report from a world renowned fire expert saying a fire was caused by a faulty radiator and was not started deliberately. They still executed the poor chap anyway and only latter was he exonerated.

So having evidence is one thing you still need people to be honest and do the right thing.

Cameron Todd Willingham? He has not been formally exonerated. However he probably was innocent.

[Adam]

It's disappointing QC has gone the same way of Mike, Lookout, David, Roch & Bill - has seen but can't reveal.

But his choice.

[killingeve]

Its probably already been thrown out and they're scrambling around trying to conjure something up in the '28 day window of opportunity' before the door is finally slammed shut!

[guest29835]

You said -


'What I will say is that there are supporters of Jeremy's, including some who have seen what I have seen, who are going round saying he will definitely be released next year'

----------

I didn't say 'you believe'.

Keep up.

I think you've gone back and edited that post.  I think you and Cambridgecutie are just trying to wind me up, so you're now on Ignore. I was reluctant to do this, but it's just become a waste of time engaging with you and I also think the case has moved on.

[killingeve]

I think you've gone back and edited that post.  I think you and Cambridgecutie are just trying to wind me up, so you're now on Ignore. I was reluctant to do this, but it's just become a waste of time engaging with you and I also think the case has moved on.

Not at all.  You simply don't take kindly to having your posts challenged.

[Adam]

I think you've gone back and edited that post.  I think you and Cambridgecutie are just trying to wind me up, so you're now on Ignore. I was reluctant to do this, but it's just become a waste of time engaging with you and I also think the case has moved on.

If I have, it will say.

It doesn't.

[Jane]

I think you've gone back and edited that post.  I think you and Cambridgecutie are just trying to wind me up, so you're now on Ignore. I was reluctant to do this, but it's just become a waste of time engaging with you and I also think the case has moved on.

I'm certain ngb will feel relieved. He must weary of receiving your constant complaints.

[Roch]

Not at all.  You simply don't take kindly to having your posts challenged.

TBF, you have been on a wind up from day one. As has Adam. That does not mean that all of your posts are wind ups. Some are worth reading.

[killingeve]

TBF, you have been in a wind up from day one. As has Adam. That does not mean that all of your posts are wind ups. Some are worth reading.

Have you considered I might find some of the posts here a 'wind up'?

- David's diluted menstrual blood theory contaminating the silencer
- Lookout's daily factually incorrect posts
- JackieD's one-trick pony (which the jury was warned about)
- Your claims that two highly qualified pathologists of long experience called it wrong over routine matters


 

[killingeve]

I think you've gone back and edited that post.  I think you and Cambridgecutie are just trying to wind me up, so you're now on Ignore. I was reluctant to do this, but it's just become a waste of time engaging with you and I also think the case has moved on.

Roch has challenged me to go through your early posts and critique them which I intend to do.

[JackieD]

Have you considered I might find some of the posts here a 'wind up'?

- David's diluted menstrual blood theory contaminating the silencer
- Lookout's daily factually incorrect posts
- JackieD's one-trick pony (which the jury was warned about)
- Your claims that two highly qualified pathologists of long experience called it wrong over routine matters

Well if I am a one trick pony regarding Julie Mugford and the bloody money deal take it up with the moderator.
He’s an expert. Furthermore for all the friend of the family etc etc the golden nugget in this case is the notes regarding Julie Mugford. If a documentary maker here or America everything will fall down like a pack of cards and you will see a number of people in the dock charged with perjury

Nothing will be acceptable to people in this country after such a massive conspiracy

Also any tiny piece of good news regarding the case is so welcome.  I wouldn’t expect QC to share a source on this forum

[lookout]

Its probably already been thrown out and they're scrambling around trying to conjure something up in the '28 day window of opportunity' before the door is finally slammed shut!

Why should you be bothered ? 

[Adam]

Well if I am a one trick pony regarding Julie Mugford and the bloody money deal take it up with the moderator.
He’s an expert. Furthermore for all the friend of the family etc etc the golden nugget in this case is the notes regarding Julie Mugford. If a documentary maker here or America everything will fall down like a pack of cards and you will see a number of people in the dock charged with perjury

Nothing will be acceptable to people in this country after such a massive conspiracy

Also any tiny piece of good news regarding the case is so welcome.  I wouldn’t expect QC to share a source on this forum

[lookout]

Have you considered I might find some of the posts here a 'wind up'?

- David's diluted menstrual blood theory contaminating the silencer
- Lookout's daily factually incorrect posts
- JackieD's one-trick pony (which the jury was warned about)
- Your claims that two highly qualified pathologists of long experience called it wrong over routine matters

What about your own posts ? Screwy to say the least, neither one thing nor the other.

[Roch]

I just assumed they'd refer it if me and Roch turn up and ask them nicely.

Maybe me you and Tatchell should take them for a business lunch?