The situation for Bamber when it was Sheila's turn to be shot.

[guest29835]

You need to look at both sides & have an opinion. 

I have looked at & dissected Rob's & QC's Sheila scenarios. They didn't like it, but it's what a discussion forum is about.

I'm still sulking about it now, Adam.  It's bad enough you didn't recommend me for the CT.  I went into a long sulk about that too.  Just as well you offer moral support via the PM system.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SLb6BdCHlE

[Rob_]

You need to look at both sides & have an opinion. 

I have looked at & dissected Rob's & QC's Sheila scenarios. They didn't like it, but it's what a discussion forum is about.

I don't mind you dissecting mine or anyone's scenario Adam, that's fine but it's when you nit pick and all the while you have JB cycling in total darkness in your own scenario!

[Adam]

Achieving the shots to Sheila is a major stumbling block to me anyway, that you as a guilter need to answer.

Well I have been answering it in this thread.

Bamber use minimal persuasion, force or both to put Sheila into his chosen position. Then place the rifle & pull the trigger.

[lookout]

I don't mind you dissecting mine or anyone's scenario Adam, that's fine but it's when you nit pick and all the while you have JB cycling in total darkness in your own scenario!

He's always picked everyone's posts to pieces except those who agree with him. He's only ever skimmed over innocent posts,  as not the least bit interested in them, which is why I take no notice of his posts.
Same old same old, filling forums with spaced out lines to make it look a lot and has the brass-neck to blame others for flooding the forum. He gets on my wick !

 

[Adam]

I don't mind you dissecting mine or anyone's scenario Adam, that's fine but it's when you nit pick and all the while you have JB cycling in total darkness in your own scenario!

That was put to the police, DPP & jury.

[guest29835]

He's always picked everyone's posts to pieces except those who agree with him. He's only ever skimmed over innocent posts,  as not the least bit interested in them, which is why I take no notice of his posts.
Same old same old, filling forums with spaced out lines to make it look a lot and has the brass-neck to blame others for flooding the forum. He gets on my wick !

That's a bit unfair, Lookout.  I don't know where I'd be without Adam's moral support.

[Rob_]

Well I have been answering it in this thread.

Bamber use minimal persuasion, force or both to put Sheila into his chosen position. Then place the rifle & pull the trigger.

A mother with her two children in the house, and you really believe she just laid down? She would have walked into the room and seen June, panicked and ran to her boys.

[Adam]

A mother with her two children in the house, and you really believe she just laid down? She would have walked into the room and seen June, panicked and ran to her boys.

To me very doubtful she resisted. If she did, Bamber would be too strong for her.

Any questions?

[Rob_]

To me very doubtful she resisted. If she did, Bamber would be too strong for her.

Any questions?

Yes but you are not answering them I am afraid, your whole scenario is just one huge list of unbelievable events. From JB cycling in the the dark, through to the shooting of Sheila and placing the silencer in the cupboard it's just unbelievable!

[Adam]

Yes but you are not answering them I am afraid, your whole scenario is just one huge list of unbelievable events. From JB cycling in the the dark, through to the shooting of Sheila and placing the silencer in the cupboard it's just unbelievable!

Each to their own.

The police, DPP, jury & COA  were given the information on the cycling, silencer & Bamber shooting Sheila.

[Rob_]

Each to their own.

The police, DPP, jury & COA  were given the information on the cycling, silencer & Bamber shooting Sheila.

It was 10 to 2 which will always be a problem as it shows there was severe doubt in the jury.