I don’t have to prove anything to you but I know the next documentary will obviously focus on the family and Colin tried to push the narrative about Sheila couldn’t have carried out the murders
I hope it has his televised interview where he said he was hoping to get back with Sheila at the time of the murders. He had better hope his girlfriend at the time doesn’t pop up.
Let’s hope the documentary also focus on his book his been flogging with edited letters from Jeremy.
He wants publicity let’s give it to him.
Your posts say everything about you by supporting a liar.
Why don’t you ask NGB if Sheila could murder the victims at point blank range
You won’t though will you
Mmm. I seem to recall you making that claim about every docu that's been released. Your praise of Louis Theroux, prior to the ailing of his docu, was stratospheric, but once again, it wasn't what you'd believed it was going to be. I have no doubt that any following will be the same. There have been so many now, I imagine the viewing public to be tiring of them.
You appear to have a very childish take on what he said regarding the possibility of them 'getting back together'. Whilst I either didn't see the interview, or, unlike you, heard it differently, I very much doubt that he claimed, categorically, that he intended for them to get back together. Why would he? Other than having once enjoyed a varied sex-life, they'd become like red rag to a bull. Why ion earth would he go back to that?
It's hardly surprising that there were edited letters from JB in his second book. Anyone interested can read them, in their entirety, in the original.
I'm very happy to hear Neil's opinion, but as he didn't witness it happening, it's hypothetic. In fact, I've read most of what he has to say. Most of it seems to sit around technicalities. I'm sure you're aware that IF he was released on such, it's very different from him being released because he's innocent.
Perhaps you should stop taking words at face value, and putting your own interpretation on them.
