Assessing Jeremy's Campaign Team in 2021/22

[lookout]

God I can't stand " yes " men.

[lookout]

I'm normally even-tempered until I come across someone who needs to follow someone else or they're lost because they can't stand on their own two feet. Grrrrrrr.

[killingeve]

I'm normally even-tempered until I come across someone who needs to follow someone else or they're lost because they can't stand on their own two feet. Grrrrrrr.

No idea what/who you are referring to?

[lookout]

No idea what/who you are referring to?

Adam of course.

[killingeve]

Adam of course.

Still no real idea what you're talking about. 

I'm interested in debating the case not individuals. 

I'm thinking of putting myself forward for the role of moderator to bring some much needed discipline to the place 

[JackieD]

You started it but then given your condition you might not have noticed!

You must have a reason for using multiple names

A bit of honesty would go amiss

Do you still believe Jeremy is innocent and if not why not

[Jane]

Still no real idea what you're talking about. 

I'm interested in debating the case not individuals. 

I'm thinking of putting myself forward for the role of moderator to bring some much needed discipline to the place 

I imagine there are one or two here who would thoroughly enjoy being disciplined............and one or two who definitely should be.

[Roch]

I imagine there are one or two here who would thoroughly enjoy being disciplined............and one or two who definitely should be.

I have a feeling discipline for QC might involve the birch being administered. Whereas for me, I might just get a hundred lines "I must not ... ... ...".

[killingeve]

You must have a reason for using multiple names

I don't believe I have ever used multiple names on any forum and certainly not simultaneously.  You appear to have two accounts here?

A bit of honesty would go amiss

You said it!

Do you still believe Jeremy is innocent and if not why not

I am afraid that's an impoosible question for anyone to answer. 

Lets stick to debating the case and see what transpires.

[David1819]

I am afraid that's an impoosible question for anyone to answer. 

You have made over 15,000 posts on various forums proclaiming JBs innocence. "Not a doubt in my mind the conviction will be quashed!!" you said on numerous occasions. If its "impoosible" for anyone to answer for your behaviour at present. Does that not confirm you have lost it? 

[killingeve]

You have made over 15,000 posts on various forums proclaiming JBs innocence. "Not a doubt in my mind the conviction will be quashed!!" you said on numerous occasions. If its "impoosible" for anyone to answer for your behaviour at present. Does that not confirm you have lost it?

Have I?  Did I?

You seem to be assuming I had it the first place!? 

Why are you so concerned with what I and/or others think?  Its getting tiresome.  Just put me on ignore or respond to my case related posts otherwise I will make a case for a ban.

[David1819]

Have I?  Did I?

You no longer have any plausible deniability about of your identity. You are making an idiot out of yourself.

Why are you so concerned with what I and/or others think?  Its getting tiresome.  Just put me on ignore or respond to my case related posts otherwise I will make a case for a ban.

Good luck with that. 

[Roch]

Lets stick to debating the case and see what transpires.

Well I am interested in any take you have on the case that doesn't necessarily adhere to the 'official' version. Even if it's a guilt argument. Nevertheless I can see David's point. We would rather you reverted to your normal innocent position, even if that is anti-campaign team or anti-defence strategy. We can live with that, from a supporter.

[Adam]

David is so chuffed he believes he has outed someone else, years after outing Scipio. And grassed on them.

He wants to remind himself whenever the poster posts.

The one time I praise David, it is then claimed Lookout (yes Lookout) & Roch spotted Holly & Scipio under other guises. Although I don't recall seeing these posts.

David sure hammered the points home & grassed to the moderator about Scipio.

[guest29835]

I have a feeling discipline for QC might involve the birch being administered. Whereas for me, I might just get a hundred lines "I must not ... ... ...".

Oooooooooooo.....a bit of DISCIPLINE...!