0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If you are drunk at 11:47pm on a Tuesday evening posting on a true crime forum. If that does not scream alcoholic, I don't know what does. This is when I decided to pull the plug on the red forum.
Alcoholly? If the forum had a minimum entry requirement you wouldn't be here! The article doesn't need to refer to menstrual blood to blow apart your absurd theory that a pair of menstural blood stained knickers left to soak in a bucket of water would be capable of yielding the results relevant to this case. It refers to quality and quantity of blood required for the type of tests carried out in this case.Conventional serological analysisAnalysis of the proteins, enzymes, and antigens present in the blood. These substances are more susceptible to degradation than DNA and this type of testing usually requires a "large" sample (quarter size) in good condition for optimal results. This type of testing is rarely statistically individualizing.https://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/blood.htmlDo you believe a "large" sample in good condition can be found in a bucket of water?
Poor Adam. He joined this forum one month before Paul Harrison changed his agenda, giving him the false impression he had made people change their mind.Now almost 25 THOUSAND posts later, Someone finally tells him how good his posts are. Turns out it was a JB supporter winding people up. Adam is in much need of emotional support right now.
Surely even you are not so stupid as to take someone on an internet forum with the username Holly Goodhead displaying an image of Captain Mainwaring from Dad's Army seriously!
Indeed I don't take you seriously.
Good. Lets move on then.
Who said the results were "optimal" in this case?You can tell from the crime scene photos that the bucket is not full of water. We only have AEs word that the knickers were soaking.
I've provided a source previously. Conventional serological analysisAnalysis of the proteins, enzymes, and antigens present in the blood. These substances are more susceptible to degradation than DNA and this type of testing usually requires a "large" sample (quarter size) in good condition for optimal results. This type of testing is rarely statistically individualizing.https://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/blood.htmlIn addition to the above I exchanged emails some time ago with George Schiro the forensic scientist who wrote the article.
Hi Holly
I remember when you told me about this
And so, both CambridgeCutie and Holly Goodhead have made contact with George Schiro on the exact same subject and quote the same pieces of the same text. Some obscure scientist nobody has ever heard of. What a coincidence..
And you don't think others do what you do ie read through the back posts of others especially when it is known only two UK based forums discuss the case on a regular basis? When I joined this forum I read through all of NGB1066's posts as he is an expert of sorts and I was interested in what he had to say. Not sure what you mean by nobody has heard of George Schiro? He wrote an article which is relevant to this case and his details are on the internet. https://witnessdirectory.com/georgeschirohttps://www.linkedin.com/in/george-schiro-b1411926https://forensicscienceresources.com/GeorgeCV.htmIf only you dedicated the same sort of time and energy to researching the case as you do trawling through the back posts of others you might actually turn something up of interest!
Hi Alcoholly 👋
Hi Sobriety but still come up with rubbish theories about a pair of menstrual stained knickers left soaking in a bucket of water for days on end contaminating the silencer If this is what sobriety does for you I'll have some of what Holly is on
