Sequence of events surrounding the silencer.

[killingeve]

Yes but still a quiet gun.

In relation to what?

[killingeve]

How the silencer was found and handled is what is ridiculous, to me whose blood is in it is not that important bearing in mind it's 1985. There could potentially have been traces of five people's blood in it if JB did the crime, which maybe would have covered something like 80% of the population?

It was important to the prosecution, trial judge and jurors.  It is arguably the most important aspect of the case against Bamber and underpins his conviction.

Please explain?

[Roch]

What evidence are you referring to?

Which podcast?

I don't understand the first question.

Re which podcast, I don't know as I haven't kept any record of them and there are lots. It was within the first 3rd of them, at a guess.

[killingeve]

I don't understand the first question.

You referred to "volume of evidence"? 

Re which podcast, I don't know as I haven't kept any record of them and there are lots. It was within the first 3rd of them, at a guess.

No Way am I wasting time listening to reams of rubbish just to confirm more rubbish.  Yes a second shot was fired into Sheila. 

[lookout]

Was JB transferred to Wakefield in the hope that he'd be killed by an inmate, to silence him ?

[Roch]

You referred to "volume of evidence"? 

No Way am I wasting time listening to reams of rubbish just to confirm more rubbish.  Yes a second shot was fired into Sheila.

Yes, volume of evidence.

If you're not prepared to listen to podcasts then you shouldn't purport to know the case from their perspective.

Even the CT recognise that some podcasts contain errors. If you are deterred by the first error you think you've heard, then as I said to RJ recently, you're at risk of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

[guest29835]

I don't know to quote different bits of posts & respond in one post.

Your posts are often 5-10 times longer than everyone else's. Often with apparent new information. Resulting in lots of questions & more than one post needed.

I don't need to do it with other posters. David's 'sequence of events' post being the exception.

Please stop messing around and do as you have been asked. 

Please stop disrespecting this Forum and its members. 

Criticism is fine.  Please go ahead and dissect my posts, but please stop messing around now.  If your intention is to annoy, you have succeeded.  Your behaviour is very annoying, as well as immature. 

[Adam]

Please stop messing around and do as you have been asked. 

Please stop disrespecting this Forum and its members. 

Criticism is fine.  Please go ahead and dissect my posts, but please stop messing around now.  If your intention is to annoy, you have succeeded.  Your behaviour is very annoying, as well as immature.

I have. As stated in reply 343.

I'll certainly dissect your posts. Please respond, don't just ignore. Respond without name calling, crying or sarcasim. Or say 'it's already been posted'.

[Adam]

Supporters always deflecting from their pathetically weak arguments by moaning about the posting styles of those who believe Bamber guilty as charged   

A pity. I'm usually the only one who responds to QC's & David's posts. Guess they don't like questions.

[Steve_uk]

Please stop messing around and do as you have been asked. 

Please stop disrespecting this Forum and its members. 

Criticism is fine.  Please go ahead and dissect my posts, but please stop messing around now.  If your intention is to annoy, you have succeeded.  Your behaviour is very annoying, as well as immature.

What humbug. You have no shred of credibility whatsoever left on this issue and are lucky still to be here.

[lookout]

Just been watching a docu. about Dontae Sharpe who was imprisoned for 26 years and was exonerated last month. All I can say is what a lovely man he is, a complete gentleman ! It's those who put him away who were the rats and utterly clueless. 

[David1819]

Supporters always deflecting from their pathetically weak arguments by moaning about the posting styles of those who believe Bamber guilty as charged   

Alcoholly when are going to stop this trolling campaign?

[lookout]

Alcoholly when are going to stop this trolling campaign?

Obviously can't help it as it's a well known fact that alcohol addles the brain. It's contagious too !

[mike tesko]

Was JB transferred to Wakefield in the hope that he'd be killed by an inmate, to silence him ?

The information that 'I have received' regarding this matter [ from 'UC'] is that he wanted to be closer location wise to me ['I live at Barnsley, South Yorkshire']. I currently don't communicate with 'Jeremy' [letter wise, by phone, or visits] because there is no urgent need for him or me, to do so. I KNOW what the truth is concerning any possible influence he may, or may not have had, in the tragedy. 'He' knows, not to 'fuck with me' and 'I know not to fuck him about'. Lets just say, that as things stand, 'we both are aware and have respect for each others views in connection with the case which has been successfully brought against him. I am contracted by mutual agreement with' Jeremy' to be detached from the present campaign teams involvement in trying to secure clearing his name, and I have no complaints about this. But, in the background, I will always contribute, whenever, and wherever it seems appropriate for me to do so.

He is incarcerated less than 12 miles [Wakefield Prison] for a specific reason/purpose, which involves the authorities wish and desire for me to resume contact with him, like when he was serving part of his sentence at HMP Full Sutton' after I was released from prison because of police corruption [in my own particular case, and circumstances] investigated by 'Greater Manchester police', led by 'DCS', 'Grange Catlow', and supported originally by 'a senior Crown Prosecution person'. I believe that any prospect of my  [own] convictions being officially overturned were influenced by the fact that I was supporting 'Jeremy('s)' bid to get his own convictions overturned...

[guest29835]

What humbug. You have no shred of credibility whatsoever left on this issue and are lucky still to be here.

Just to be clear, are you saying that you approve of Adam's idiosyncratic posting style, which is the issue under discussion?  Yes or No answer will do.

Also, can I point out to you that you have - again - just breached a specific forum rule, which forbids personal attacks on members.

Could you stop doing that, please?

Thank you.