Hi Alcoholly.
As you already know there is no mention in that article of menstrual blood being incapable of producing these results.
Why are you pretending to be a guilter? I know you have plenty of time on your hands being unemployed and all but still it's rather pathetic and pointless.
Alcoholly?
If the forum had a minimum entry requirement you wouldn't be here! The article doesn't need to refer to menstrual blood to blow apart your absurd theory that a pair of menstural blood stained knickers left to soak in a bucket of water would be capable of yielding the results relevant to this case. It refers to quality and quantity of blood required for the type of tests carried out in this case.
Conventional serological analysisAnalysis of the proteins, enzymes, and antigens present in the blood. These substances are more susceptible to
degradation than DNA and this type of testing usually requires a
"large" sample (quarter size) in
good condition for optimal results. This type of testing is rarely statistically individualizing.
https://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/blood.htmlDo you believe a "large" sample in good condition can be found in a bucket of water?