And then there's David with his diluted period blood theory.
A gentleman this morning who posts under user name Mike has said new evidence has emerged. I asked for evidence of the newly emerged evidence but at this moment in time nothing. 
The newly identified evidence, concerns the fact that exhibit reference 'DB/1', lab' item no. 23, that was submitted by Essex police to Huntingdon Lab' on the 30th August 1985, was not a silencer [afterall], but rather, it was 'a small flake of dried blood' that 'David Boutflour' claims 'to have scraped from the flat surface of a silencers metal end cap' with 'use of a razor blade', which he claims to have kept and held on to, because [in his own words] 'it fascinated him'. Well he didn't keep it (so to speak) since this became exhibit 'DB/1' (lab' item no. 23) that 'Essex police submitted to Huntingdon Lab' on the '30th August 1985' and from which 'the blood grouping evidence' obtained on the '12th', '13th', '18th' and the '19th September 1985', originated - no evidence actually existed to confirm or to establish that any blood group type [allegedly relating solely to 'Sheila'] was found inside silencer 'DRB/1'. Infact the opposite is true![if 'David Boutflours account was to be beleived, then the small dried flake of blood, was found on the outside of the silencer, not the inside of it] It turns out that' this was the method' and 'policy' by which the case against 'Jeremy Bamber' was 'fabricated' , in order to 'get a conviction' which turned out to be 'financially beneficial to relatives' who took part 'in executing the evidence' , as I have described..
