Author Topic: Questions for Steve  (Read 5625 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Questions for Steve
« on: October 20, 2021, 10:42:AM »
Julie Mugford admitted trying to smother/murder Jeremy Bamber.
What does that say about her character?
I would say nearly all members here would say she sounds completely unhinged
I would say most members here would say she should never be allowed to go into a teaching career

If you are referring to me as a bamberette I am going to ask for you to be permanently banned
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2021, 10:45:AM »
What do you think about Julie Mugfords criminal history of 13 separate cheque frauds

Would you say that makes her an expert liar

Did these separate 13 cheque frauds happen before the caravan robbery

I will remind you that the criminal age of responsibility   
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2021, 09:44:PM »
Julie Mugford admitted trying to smother/murder Jeremy Bamber.
What does that say about her character?
I would say nearly all members here would say she sounds completely unhinged
I would say most members here would say she should never be allowed to go into a teaching career

If you are referring to me as a bamberette I am going to ask for you to be permanently banned
She put a pillow over his face for a few seconds. Jeremy Bamber was not to my knowledge a defenceless quadraplegic. It says she felt let down after a courtship of nearly two years. Nobody likes to be strung along by a partner who promised marriage, then backed out. If you banned everyone from teaching who had thrown a tantrum in their past there would be nobody left, would there?

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2021, 09:52:PM »
What do you think about Julie Mugfords criminal history of 13 separate cheque frauds

Would you say that makes her an expert liar

Did these separate 13 cheque frauds happen before the caravan robbery

I will remind you that the criminal age of responsibility
It makes me think how young she was. Didn't I read somewhere that by the age of 18 one in three people has a criminal record of some kind? I can remember during my schooldays in the 1970s how shocked we all were when one of our friends was caught shoplifting a load of chocolate bars from NSS and stuffing them into his briefcase. This kind of thing just didn't happen at grammar school. Julie was young and foolish, as was Susan Battersby. They had been led astray by Jeremy calling them goody two-shoes. One criminal day and thirteen transactions, though I'm unsure myself of the exact number.

Thank you for reminding me of the age of criminal responsibility.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2021, 09:53:PM »
JackieD gets carried away -

Julie tried to murder Jeremy. She also committed 13 cheque book frauds.

----------

It was one cheque book fraud.

Julie is not going to achieve a murder by putting a pillow over Bamber!
« Last Edit: October 21, 2021, 09:56:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2021, 09:57:PM »
Julie Mugford admitted trying to smother/murder Jeremy Bamber.
What does that say about her character?
I would say nearly all members here would say she sounds completely unhinged
I would say most members here would say she should never be allowed to go into a teaching career

If you are referring to me as a bamberette I am going to ask for you to be permanently banned

What's a bamberette?  Sounds like a scooter of some description?

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2021, 10:01:PM »
What do you think about Julie Mugfords criminal history of 13 separate cheque frauds

Would you say that makes her an expert liar

Did these separate 13 cheque frauds happen before the caravan robbery

I will remind you that the criminal age of responsibility

What do you think the jury thought?
« Last Edit: October 21, 2021, 10:04:PM by Cambridgecutie »

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2021, 10:03:PM »
What's a bamberette?  Sounds like a scooter of some description?
It's a supporter of Jeremy Bamber. I note lookout in the past has objected to the term. It's shorthand really for "the Jeremy supporters", though may conjure in some minds attractive American cheerleaders with their skimpy costumes swishing vinyl pom-poms.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2021, 10:08:PM »
It's a supporter of Jeremy Bamber. I note lookout in the past has objected to the term. It's shorthand really for "the Jeremy supporters", though may conjure in some minds attractive American cheerleaders with their skimpy costumes swishing vinyl pom-poms.

Is the term unisex?

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2021, 10:11:PM »
Is the term unisex?
Well I thought so, though some think it refers to the female gender only. Why it should be labelled offensive I don't know.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #10 on: October 21, 2021, 11:09:PM »
It's a supporter of Jeremy Bamber. I note lookout in the past has objected to the term. It's shorthand really for "the Jeremy supporters", though may conjure in some minds attractive American cheerleaders with their skimpy costumes swishing vinyl pom-poms.





It's not the vision I have in my mind Steve  ;D

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #11 on: October 21, 2021, 11:12:PM »




It's not the vision I have in my mind Steve  ;D





I don't think a vest would look the part with a skimpy costume.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #12 on: October 22, 2021, 09:11:AM »
She put a pillow over his face for a few seconds. Jeremy Bamber was not to my knowledge a defenceless quadraplegic. It says she felt let down after a courtship of nearly two years. Nobody likes to be strung along by a partner who promised marriage, then backed out. If you banned everyone from teaching who had thrown a tantrum in their past there would be nobody left, would there?

Your wrong again. Trying to misrepresent the situation

Her position was crystal clear she tried to smother Jeremy to prevent him ever being with another women.

It’s horrendous, dangerous, spiteful, wicked unhinged behaviour
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2021, 09:15:AM »
It makes me think how young she was. Didn't I read somewhere that by the age of 18 one in three people has a criminal record of some kind? I can remember during my schooldays in the 1970s how shocked we all were when one of our friends was caught shoplifting a load of chocolate bars from NSS and stuffing them into his briefcase. This kind of thing just didn't happen at grammar school. Julie was young and foolish, as was Susan Battersby. They had been led astray by Jeremy calling them goody two-shoes. One criminal day and thirteen transactions, though I'm unsure myself of the exact number.

Thank you for reminding me of the age of criminal responsibility.


You are absolutely crazy!!!! You need help.  You are now trying to blame Jeremy for Mugfords 13 separate  cheque frauds

Please provide proof or is this something you have made up in your warped mindset
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #14 on: October 22, 2021, 09:22:AM »
JackieD the trial lasted some 6 weeks I believe and it was actually about far more than Julie Mugford.  You post as though this woman single-handedly sealed Bamber's fate.  She didn't! 

What may I ask is your obsession with this prosecution witness?