So it's now become a banning offence to write down your own thoughts ? Since when ?
I did not make a mistake about the black eye as June had suffered one prior to the murders. Then I happened to say that June could have walked into Sheila's fist, not " that it caused it " which are two different things so if you're training to become a lawyer you've got a lot to learn !!
Your fault for being de-humanised. If you can't tell the difference between fact and fiction, then you're not as clever as I thought, especially as this case swings between the two !
I don't apologise nor bow and scrape for something I haven't done ! It's not my fault if you've got an accusatory disposition, you'll have to work on it.
Did I say it is a banning offence to post your own thoughts? I have politely asked that you either provide a source for anything that deviates from what is commonly accepted as factually correct or make clear it is your own opinion.
If June had a black eye prior to the murders I rather think others would have had something to say about it don't you? Eg Jean Boutell, Barbara Wilson, Colin Caffell, Jeremy Bamber, the people who saw her on 6th Aug eg shopkeepers, local villagers, farm workers.
The fact is there is no evidence June sustained a black eye prior to the murders or that she missed a bible class.
If June missed a bible class without giving advance warning of her absense don't you think the people concerned might have surfaced over the years?
If I didn't know better I could be forgiven for thinking you're a stooge to harm Bamber in that your posts actually make Bamber look even more guilty if that's at all possible!
