Podcast by Bamber's support group containing information about 03/21 submission

[killingeve]

Your use of exclamation marks is very telling. You obviously have two much time on your hands so why don’t you use your ‘intelligence’ and try and get all notes and evidence regarding Julie Mugford released. Why aren’t you pressing for those to be released considering she was the main prosecution witness
That will give you something to do

And your misuse of the word 'two' is equally telling!!!!!!!!!!

The case is about more than Julie Mugford!  Why are you obsessed with this woman?!

[Steve_uk]

You're telling me!  They may be well intentioned but the likes of the support group with the podcast and website do Bamber a great disservice in my humble opinion. 

Other miscarriages of justice or even those seeking justice eg the family of Stephen Lawrence have not set up what could be described as a circus.  They have just got on with it quietly and in doing so met with their objectives.

A very good point Cambridge.

[killingeve]

Why should he when there's a process in progress ? JB will disclose what he's got when he's good and ready. I'm sure you would appreciate that ?

No I don't appreciate it at all.  The document explains over 100 pages why Bamber's 2011/12 submission failed.  Bamber and his support group want to garner public support and yet we are being denied critically important information.  Why?

[lookout]

No I don't appreciate it at all.  The document explains over 100 pages why Bamber's 2011/12 submission failed.  Bamber and his support group want to garner public support and yet we are being denied critically important information.  Why?

In case the media got hold of it ? There are some things that are obviously worth holding on to until the bitter end. I can't say as I blame them at this juncture.

[JackieD]

And your misuse of the word 'two' is equally telling!!!!!!!!!!

The case is about more than Julie Mugford!  Why are you obsessed with this woman?!

Exclamation marks again. I’m obsessed with the truth and as your obsessed with being open and transparent why are you not shouting out why evidence given by the bunny boiling main prosecution witness is still held under PII

I will become less obsessed when she is locked up for the numerous serious crimes she committed

[killingeve]

In case the media got hold of it ? There are some things that are obviously worth holding on to until the bitter end. I can't say as I blame them at this juncture.

It was the bitter end Lookout!  The review commission rejected Bamber's submission. 

How will you feel if the current submission is rejected and he withholds yet another report? 

Will you still have what amounts to blind faith? 

[killingeve]

Exclamation marks again. I’m obsessed with the truth and as your obsessed with being open and transparent why are you not shouting out why evidence given by the bunny boiling main prosecution witness is still held under PII

I will become less obsessed when she is locked up for the numerous serious crimes she committed

And how do you feel about Bamber withholding a 100 page document from the review commission detailing why it rejected Bamber's 2011/12 submission.

Even if, and its a big IFBamber's conviction is overturned I doubt there will be any repercussions for Julie Mugford. 

[Adam]

It was the bitter end Lookout!  The review commission rejected Bamber's submission. 

How will you feel if the current submission is rejected and he withholds yet another report? 

Will you still have what amounts to blind faith?

You might as well read & respond to the link I posted. It is a good 49 point summary.

[killingeve]

You might as well read & respond to the link I posted. It is a good 49 point summary.

The summary is interesting thank you but I would like to see the other 100 pages!

[killingeve]

JackieD, Lookout and Roche

As you're so convinced Bamber is innocent why don't you write to him and ask him for a copy of the full Statement of Reasons issued by the review commission setting out, over 100 pages, exactly why his submission failed.  If he is unable or unwilling to part with this information then maybe you need to ask the question why!

[lookout]

It was the bitter end Lookout!  The review commission rejected Bamber's submission. 

How will you feel if the current submission is rejected and he withholds yet another report? 

Will you still have what amounts to blind faith?

It won't happen, will it ? They know what they're doing. Maybe " blind faith " is better than having no faith at all ?

[Adam]

The summary is interesting thank you but I would like to see the other 100 pages!

What do think of the full 'Court of Appeal' document?

[lookout]

JackieD, Lookout and Roche

As you're so convinced Bamber is innocent why don't you write to him and ask him for a copy of the full Statement of Reasons issued by the review commission setting out, over 100 pages, exactly why his submission failed.  If he is unable or unwilling to part with this information then maybe you need to ask the question why!

Now you're being silly ! Just as if JB's going to hand anything over to strangers  He might have been a mug before he went to prison but I'm sure he's learned a lot since. I don't blame him for not trusting anyone any more.

[killingeve]

What do think of the full 'Court of Appeal' document?

It proves Bamber's guilt beyond a shadow of doubt!!!!!!!!!!

[killingeve]

Now you're being silly ! Just as if JB's going to hand anything over to strangers  He might have been a mug before he went to prison but I'm sure he's learned a lot since. I don't blame him for not trusting anyone any more.

Well he has handed a lot of material over to someone as its here on this forum so why not the statement of reasons document?