Podcast by Bamber's support group containing information about 03/21 submission

[JackieD]

It's so often cock-up rather than conspiracy.

Says the expert ??

Pointless post

[Steve_uk]

I am surprised that a long standing member cannot find another members posts. Click on search for members. Enter Bubo bubo. A more discerning access can be obtained using the search function. Enter the thread title and use Bubo bubo in the 'by poster' field. Happy hunting.

I'm not doing that. It was bad enough trawling through Mr. Q C Chevalier's posts to find the Sheila scenarios for Adam's thread. This is typical behaviour of the Jeremy supporters: you claim something preposterous, which you cannot possibly substantiate and whilst new members or casual browsers are fooled thereby I am not.

[Steve_uk]

Says the expert ??

Pointless post

..and you would know about both.

[Rob_]

I'm not doing that. It was bad enough trawling through Mr. Q C Chevalier's posts to find the Sheila scenarios for Adam's thread. This is typical behaviour of the Jeremy supporters: you claim something preposterous, which you cannot possibly substantiate and whilst new members or casual browsers are fooled thereby I am not.

It's easy to find Steve, I just re-read the post again, I think it was the second post to appear in the search.

[Bubo bubo]

I'm not doing that. It was bad enough trawling through Mr. Q C Chevalier's posts to find the Sheila scenarios for Adam's thread. This is typical behaviour of the Jeremy supporters: you claim something preposterous, which you cannot possibly substantiate and whilst new members or casual browsers are fooled thereby I am not.

Pleading ignorance and lack of willingness to read what others post is not acceptable.

[Bubo bubo]

I'm not doing that. It was bad enough trawling through Mr. Q C Chevalier's posts to find the Sheila scenarios for Adam's thread. This is typical behaviour of the Jeremy supporters: you claim something preposterous, which you cannot possibly substantiate and whilst new members or casual browsers are fooled thereby I am not.

How can you make a statement like that when it is clear you do not read what others are saying without a detailed examination and response. This case does not lend it self to a rough guide to the case of JB. There is a lot of detail to consume, understand and evaluate before coming to a conclusion. You it seems want the idiots guide to the Bamber case for those who do not have the time or inclination to perform a rigorous examination of ALL the facts.

[Steve_uk]

I've waded through enough drivel in almost 10 years. When did you arrive?

[killingeve]

How can you make a statement like that when it is clear you do not read what others are saying without a detailed examination and response. This case does not lend it self to a rough guide to the case of JB. There is a lot of detail to consume, understand and evaluate before coming to a conclusion. You it seems want the idiots guide to the Bamber case for those who do not have the time or inclination to perform a rigorous examination of ALL the facts.

If we read what every crank had to say on the internet we would never leave home!

The facts are simple.  Its the likes of you who wish to over complicate with theories that do not stand up to scrutiny such as the police shooting June.  First it was Sheila now June 

Either Sheila shot her parents and sons and took her own life or far more likely her brother murdered all 5. 

[Bubo bubo]

If we read what every crank had to say on the internet we would never leave home!

The facts are simple.  Its the likes of you who wish to over complicate with theories that do not stand up to scrutiny such as the police shooting June.  First it was Sheila now June 

Either Sheila shot her parents and sons and took her own life or far more likely her brother murdered all 5.

False answer you are not being asked to do anything of the sort. You are only being asked to read what people who believe in a MOJ  say on one forum out of millions. I have never argued that the police killed SC. You can choose which posters to read or ignore.

[Roch]

Has anyone listened to the latest podcast? I haven't yet. It's a long one, regarding claimed factual errors in the Theroux programme. Normally QC would have posted up a link.

[lookout]

I'll listen to it now while I'm having my lunch. Thanks for the reminder as I may have unconsciously been waiting for QC to put it on the forum too.

[lookout]

I enjoyed this long podcast and can't wait for the day that questions are going to be asked.

[killingeve]

Has anyone listened to the latest podcast? I haven't yet. It's a long one, regarding claimed factual errors in the Theroux programme. Normally QC would have posted up a link.

I had it on in the background this morning whilst I was doing other things.  According to Yvonne the prog makers wanted her to sit on a bed to take a call from Bamber.   

She was trying to take the moral high ground about not wanting to get involved because scene of crime images were going to be used but at the end said the next episode would involve "how Sheila could have and had hurt her children".  Seems rather contradictory! 

[killingeve]

Is there any evidence Sheila hurt her children?

[lookout]

Is there any evidence Sheila hurt her children?

Yes---she shot them.