Updated Bamber scenario. Matching crime scene evidence.

[Zoso]

Most of Junes wounds were to her right side most of the staining is also on the right as it is viewed. So she had to be on the bed face down or lying on her right side.

Or getting out after being shot

[Zoso]

Why would it be anywhere near the bed given the other duvet etc. It was summer and they had the window open. The blood stains may just be a reflection because of the reflective nature of the material.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=39405;image

It's not my house, people have all kinds of things in their own house, which other may find odd. And yes, it was summer - you find it strange that they have all of those bed clothes but not that they would have the AGA cranked on full in the early hours?

[Jane]

There's only you Jane and Adam posting. Jane seems to be almost totally uninterested in learning anything new about the case. Adam seems to be here solely for this own amusement. You've only just started posting in more detail, ironically since Adam took more of a back seat.

If you mean I'm not interested in taking on board information I believe to be false, you're correct. However, I believe everyone is entitled to their own views.

[Roch]

If you mean I'm not interested in taking on board information I believe to be false, you're correct. However, I believe everyone is entitled to their own views.

Which false information?

[Adam]

So someone closed it - what difference dose it make? You have no problem with the bathroom window being opened and closed!

Extreme conspiracy theorist.

[Zoso]

There's only you Jane and Adam posting. Jane seems to be almost totally uninterested in learning anything new about the case. Adam seems to be here solely for this own amusement. You've only just started posting in more detail, ironically since Adam took more of a back seat.

Nothing to do with Adam. I don't have a problem with him. I would argue that we're all here for amusement or because we enjoy it. Anyone who thinks they're going to make a difference and be the one to free eeee, Jer-emy Bam-ber! Is a little deluded and will be almost certainly disappointed.

[Roch]

Nothing to do with Adam. I don't have a problem with him. I would argue that we're all here for amusement or because we enjoy it. Anyone who thinks they're going to make a difference and be the one to free eeee, Jer-emy Bam-ber! Is a little deluded and will be almost certainly disappointed.

I think if an innocence supporting member mirrored Adam's forum behaviour, you would be less inclined to just give them a free pass.

It is to do with Adam because your posting has been more regular and more in-depth since Adam's restrictions. I guess you felt you had to step in. Either that or you just found the forum better without Adam's threads but won't admit it. 

[Zoso]

I think if an innocence supporting member mirrored Adam's forum behaviour, you would be less inclined to just give them a free pass.

It is to do with Adam because your posting has been more regular and more in-depth since Adam's restrictions. I guess you felt you had to step in. Either that or you just found the forum better without Adam's threads but won't admit it. 

I think I am better placed to know whether me posting more is to do with Adam or not? Like I said, I don't have a problem with him but I could aim your comment right back at you. If an innocent supporter had a similar style, I doubt you and the other innocent supporters would have a problem - quite the opposite.

[Adam]

I think if an innocence supporting member mirrored Adam's forum behaviour, you would be less inclined to just give them a free pass.

It is to do with Adam because your posting has been more regular and more in-depth since Adam's restrictions. I guess you felt you had to step in. Either that or you just found the forum better without Adam's threads but won't admit it. 

I create threads on the case Roch. It is a discussion forum.

They are on specific issues. As the current Electric Blanket thread is.

You never create threads and look up to BuboBubo. So publically stopped me.

This will never happen again.

[Roch]

I think I am better placed to know whether me posting more is to do with Adam or not? Like I said, I don't have a problem with him but I could aim your comment right back at you. If an innocent supporter had a similar style, I doubt you and the other innocent supporters would have a problem - quite the opposite.

I think Adam has been accommodated with great patience for many years now. Adam has had a good run. There's never been anyone quite like Adam to compare with.

I don't think there has been an innocent Adam, though has been problematic innocent supporters. I think I am right - the forum pulled you in, in the wake of Adam - maybe it was subconscious?  But we will agree to disagree.

[Roch]

I create threads on the case Roch. It is a discussion forum.

They are on specific issues. As the current Electric Blanket thread is.

You never create threads and look up to BuboBubo. So publically stopped me.

This will never happen again.

I think Bubo is a serious poster. But you are not a serious poster. You are here purely as some kind of game for your own amusement.

[Adam]

I think Bubo is a serious poster. But you are not a serious poster. You are here purely as some kind of game for your own amusement.

Yes I found 80 pieces of forensic evidence by not being a serious poster.

[Zoso]

I think Adam has been accommodated with great patience for many years now. Adam has had a good run. There's never been anyone quite like Adam to compare with.

I don't think there has been an innocent Adam, though has been problematic innocent supporters. I think I am right - the forum pulled you in, in the wake of Adam - maybe it was subconscious?  But we will agree to disagree.

No, we won't agree to disagree - you're doing what another poster does and that's beneath you!

[Roch]

No, we won't agree to disagree - you're doing what another poster does and that's beneath you!

Sorry I don't understand that.

[Zoso]

Sorry I don't understand that.

OK