THE SILENCER SAGA

[David1819]

Thanks. No one has known that over the last 36 years.

Some people have trouble remembering things...

[David1819]

Conspiracy theorists often use AEs 14/8 statement to argue that no silencer was collected on August 10th.

They ignore the fact that the officer taking the statement was not inclined to ask her to make a statement about it at that stage. Furthermore the silencer is mentioned in her handwritten notes.

[Roch]

Conspiracy theorists often use AEs 14/8 statement to argue that no silencer was collected on August 10th.

They ignore the fact that the officer taking the statement was not inclined to ask her to make a statement about it at that stage. Furthermore the silencer is mentioned in her handwritten notes.

Your last sentence is not very supportive of your view.

[David1819]

Your last sentence is not very supportive of your view.

How so?

[Roch]

How so?

My apologies, I misread your post.

[Rob_]

Conspiracy theorists often use AEs 14/8 statement to argue that no silencer was collected on August 10th.

They ignore the fact that the officer taking the statement was not inclined to ask her to make a statement about it at that stage. Furthermore the silencer is mentioned in her handwritten notes.

She does not mention the silencer in her notes where she is talking about loading the rifles into the car? I find this strange unless I have missed it?

[David1819]

She does not mention the silencer in her notes where she is talking about loading the rifles into the car? I find this strange unless I have missed it?

Its mentioned here. Top sentence.

[Rob_]

Its mentioned here. Top sentence.

Thanks you have got sharp eyes!

[Bubo bubo]

Thanks you have got sharp eyes!

The whole of the first section could have been added and so might the last sentence on its own. We do not have the whole document so we have no context because of what is missing. It looks like it might have been cut from elsewhere and pasted.

It does not chime with the next piece 'with Julie &' This looks to be a continuation from another part of her notes.

Notice also the Homophobic comment thrown in for good measure.

[David1819]

The whole of the first section could have been added and so might the last sentence on its own. We do not have the whole document so we have no context because of what is missing. It looks like it might have been cut from elsewhere and pasted.

It does not chime with the next piece 'with Julie &' This looks to be a continuation from another part of her notes.

Notice also the Homophobic comment thrown in for good measure.

Bubo Bubo. Most if not all the AE notes can be found here.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1677.msg51388.html#msg51388

Also notice in one of the notes, she is working out how much of her farmland is now owned by Jeremy and how much she owes.

[David1819]

Thanks you have got sharp eyes!

You will have to thank the Amfexa for that also. 

[David1819]

Ann Eaton still had a lampshade with Junes blood on it in 2001.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1986.0.html

[killingeve]

Ann Eaton still had a lampshade with Junes blood on it in 2001.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1986.0.html

If this was true it begs the question why Mrs Bamber's sister, Mrs Boutflour, was required to provide a DNA sample for the 2002 appeal hearing.

[Bubo bubo]

If this was true it begs the question why Mrs Bamber's sister, Mrs Boutflour, was required to provide a DNA sample for the 2002 appeal hearing.

Can I suggest they wanted to see if it was June's blood on the lamp shade.

[David1819]

Can I suggest they wanted to see if it was June's blood on the lamp shade.

I would assume its far more safe and sound to obtain fresh DNA from a sibling, as opposed to something that's been sitting around for 16 years with no storage protocols (contrary to the silencer.)

Who on earth keeps a lampshade on their bedside table that has their murdered relatives blood on it from the night they were killed?