THE SILENCER SAGA

[David1819]

I haven't finished looking into this yet. 

Is Bubo barking up the wrong tree?  How do you explain the blue socks collected from the farmhouse when it was no longer a scene of crime?

Nobody was living in the house and thus the socks remained in one place. Nobody bothered to move them.

Yes he is barking up the wrong tree. He thinks the blood on the silencer documented on August the 13th was rabbit blood and the red marks were from ketchup. The police or lab staff then swapped this for human blood and red paint from the aga shelf a month later.

[Adam]

Nobody was living in the house and thus the socks remained in one place. Nobody bothered to move them.

Yes he is barking up the wrong tree. He thinks the blood on the silencer documented on August the 13th was rabbit blood and the red parks marks were from ketchup. The police or lab staff then swapped this for human blood and red paint from the aga shelf a month later.

He thinks the blood on the silencer documented on August the 13th was rabbit blood and the red parks marks were from ketchup. 

----------

Who thinks that?

[mike tesko]

The socks were photographed on the bedroom carpet close to 'Sheila Caffells' re-arranged body! That piece of bedroom carpet was cut out and burned on a fire by police, along with 'bloodstained bed matresses', and 'bed sheets'. Und er such circumstances, the socks would hardly have remained on the bedroom floor [minus the carpet] for a month long period. Essex police probably burnt the socks along with the other bloodstained items. It may well be the case, that the 'spots of blood upon them' provided evidence that blood from 'Sheila' [not 'June Bamber'] was present on the socks, and if so, that 'she' had been 'alive' and 'non fatally wounded' , prior to 'her receiving the second fatal shot' in 'the main bedroom' . We will never know, because 'Essex police', 'burnt almost', 'anything' and 'everything', which was 'capable of providing evidence', as to 'what actually took place'..

[mike tesko]

'Rigor Mortis' had not taken effect, by reference to the repositioning of 'Sheila Caffells right arm' [in the two co-joined crime scene photographs, taken by the police, moments apart]. In addition, 'prey', 'please take note', and 'pay attention' [the `devil is in the detail'], Essex police have not yet offerred an explanation as to why, and how could, the bloodstain on 'Sheilas' nightdress, in the region of her 'right shoulder' / 'armpit', grew in stature, and changed its shape, if 'a bent cop [or two, and possibly more] only' moved', ' Sheila Caffells', right hand'? These two consecutively taken crime scene photographs prove and establish beyond any doubt that bent cops originally staged 'Sheila Caffells' body, to fit their, 'four murders' and 'a suicide' [provision]..

[mike tesko]

I would now like to mention, albeit at such a late stage, that on the occasion that I viewed 'The Senior Investigators Album' [consisting of 581 case photographs] during a visit to 'Ewen Smiths' solicitors office in Birmingham, that I saw lots and lots of crime scene photographs depicting 'Sheila Caffells' body [on 'top of the bed' , and 'on the bedroom floor'] that in three consecutive photographs when police photographed her body laying on top of the bed, that 'She' was wearing the pair of socks which were later moved onto the bedroom floor next to her body, after cops moved her body, from on top of the bed, onto the floor [along with the bible]...

[Bubo bubo]

Nobody was living in the house and thus the socks remained in one place. Nobody bothered to move them.

Yes he is barking up the wrong tree. He thinks the blood on the silencer documented on August the 13th was rabbit blood and the red parks marks were from ketchup. The police or lab staff then swapped this for human blood and red paint from the aga shelf a month later.

Stop misrepresenting my views. I said that some argue that it was rabbit blood. I never said I thought it was rabbit blood. NGB please note this behaviour he keeps doing it. I said the stains were not blood and suggested other items that produce red stains. I did not say what I thought it actually was.

"This just means its a non blood stain not that it is paint. Like the brown stain which is also KM negative. She does not even suggest what made the stain and if it was paint it would need to be ingrained and she would have mentioned this aspect. Beetroot juice? tomato sauce? red wine? raspberry juice? lipstick? Need I go on?"

"The SM DB1 was subjected to a lot of scientific tests and at least one dismantling. These activities had produced no evidence of worth apart from GH’s declaration that the blood was human in origin. Some claim it could have been rabbit because of a shared enzyme. No flake was found, even though it was said to be loose between baffles, when dismantled by RC."

You are a nasty piece of work. You cannot gainsay my arguments and resort to misrepresenting my views.

I will ask for you to be banned if you keep this behaviour going.

[mike tesko]

... in three consecutive photographs when police photographed her body laying on top of the bed, that 'She' was wearing the pair of socks which were later moved onto the bedroom floor next to her body, after cops moved her body, from on top of the bed, onto the floor [along with the bible]...

When 'DS Jones' and 'DC Clark', entered the main bedroom scene [at `about 9.00 - 9.10am`] 'Sheila Caffells' body was laid on top of the bed [ on left hand side of bed, if viewed from the foot of the bed]. Her 'mothers body' ('June Bamber') was also laid next to her on the bed. 'Sheila' only had one bullet wound to her 'neck' / 'throat' at 'that stage'. In addition (rather significantly), 'she' had 'an open bible' resting 'upon her chest'. Furthermore [according to what 'DS Jones' and 'DC Clark' told 'Ann Eaton' and 'other relatives' at 'Jeremys cottage' ( 9 Head Street, Goldhanger) within about 45 minutes or so of having visited the main bedroom crime scene, back at the farmhouse] that inbetween the two bodies on the bed, was a rifle...

Here, 'lies the truth', regarding 'what actually took place', 'beforehand', and 'afterwards'...

[Bubo bubo]

The socks were photographed on the bedroom carpet close to 'Sheila Caffells' re-arranged body! That piece of bedroom carpet was cut out and burned on a fire by police, along with 'bloodstained bed matresses', and 'bed sheets'. Und er such circumstances, the socks would hardly have remained on the bedroom floor [minus the carpet] for a month long period. Essex police probably burnt the socks along with the other bloodstained items. It may well be the case, that the 'spots of blood upon them' provided evidence that blood from 'Sheila' [not 'June Bamber'] was present on the socks, and if so, that 'she' had been 'alive' and 'non fatally wounded' , prior to 'her receiving the second fatal shot' in 'the main bedroom' . We will never know, because 'Essex police', 'burnt almost', 'anything' and 'everything', which was 'capable of providing evidence', as to 'what actually took place'..

I think DB collected the socks on the day (DB6) along with his other finds DB1 - DB7. He claims he found them all on 11/09/85 and 12/09/85. but this is a lie because he could not have collected the socks since if they were not collected on the day they would have been burned by EP or Jeremy when he burned his parents clothes. Given that AE removed two buckets of blood stained and soiled clothing, took them home before binning them, are we to believe she left a pair of blood stained socks in situ in the main bedroom.

[mike tesko]

I think DB collected the socks on the day (DB6) along with his other finds DB1 - DB7. He claims he found them all on 11/09/85 and 12/09/85. but this is a lie because he could not have collected the socks since if they were not collected on the day they would have been burned by EP or Jeremy when he burned his parents clothes. Given that AE removed two buckets of blood stained and soiled clothing, took them home before binning them, are we to believe she left a pair of blood stained socks in situ in the main bedroom.

Good points!

[Bubo bubo]

Would posters please read my posts and ignore what David1819 claims are my views. He is a young man with no scruples or moral sense. He may do to you what he keeps doing to me. Thanks.

[mike tesko]

Soon after, I viewed the [`Senior Investigating Officers album'] `consisting of all '581 photographs', 'Ewen Smith' (Jeremys' solicitor/advocate) joined the 'CCRC' as 'a Commisioner'. This was around the same time, that 'Jeremy' and 'myself' became 'at odds' with 'one another'. The 'fall out' (if 'you'd like to call it that') revolved around me posting 'one photograph' which proved that 'the body of his sister' was not 'only laid on top of the bed', but also, that, 'she' had 'only received one bullet entry wound' to her 'neck' / 'throat' by the time 'police took the relevant photograph'. I 'posted that photograph' to 'Jeremy' to 'HMP Full Sutton' under 'the privilege' afforded to me, after my release from prison (pending an appeal) in July (26th) 1990. After my release, on that occasion, I became 'Jeremy Bambers', 'Mckensie man'. One of the benefits of performing this role, was that I could visit 'Jeremy' twice a day ( morning and afternoon, sessions) without the need for 'Jeremy' to send out a visiting order. All I had to do, was to phone up the prison and tell them when I intended to visit him. Of course, during those  conversations, I was asked, whether or not, it would be a morning, or an afternoon visit, or both? The prison service, were very helpful and co-operative. Hence, why over the next decade, or so, that I visited 'him' regularly. We wrote letters to eachother, and had regular telephone call (booked) appointments in the evenings. It was during one such telephone call, that I told 'Jeremy' the good news, concerning the photographic album (581) pictures that I had seen earlier that day, and that I had taken one of the photographs in question, which as far as I was concerned, suggested in the strongest terms imaginable, that 'Essex police' had 'stage managed', 'Sheila Caffells', suicide..

Of course, 'Jeremy' was excited by what 'I was reporting to him' ..

I decided to post into him, the 'said photograph' on the following morning, under the terms of my role, in his case, as his 'Mckensie man' representative...

[mike tesko]

I decided to post into him, the 'said photograph' on the following morning, under the terms of my role, in his case, as his 'Mckensie man' representative...

This act of mine, (tended in good faith) served to become the deterioration of our partnership, because 'unbeknown to me', 'Jeremy' had taken steps to secure the services of 'Giovani de Stefano' as 'his legal representative'.

[mike tesko]

Soon after, I viewed the [`Senior Investigating Officers album'] `consisting of all '581 photographs', 'Ewen Smith' (Jeremys' solicitor/advocate) joined the 'CCRC' as 'a Commisioner'..

The 'Senior Investigating Officer' [in this particular case] was non other than 'ACC', 'Peter Simpson'..

[mike tesko]

The 'Senior Investigating Officer' [in this particular case] was non other than 'ACC', 'Peter Simpson'..

' He' kept the original (complete) photographic album, 'consisting of 581 case photographs', locked 'inside his office safe', with clear instruction that 'no-one' was permitted to remove 'it', from the safe, or to view 'its content', without 'his permission', or ' his consent' ..

[mike tesko]

Meanwhile ['on the far side of the moon'], 'Jeremy Bamber', his 'legal team' and the jury' were all 'deliberately conned' into 'beleiving' and 'accepting' that there only existed 'a total' of 223 case photographs, contained in a seperate photographic album, that 'Essex police' , and the 'CPS' referred to inappropriately as 'The Master Copy Album' [missing 358, other case images]..