Oh right, he takes the piss that’s all. He does it with Adam and he did it with Steve.
I dish out to Adam and Steve what they dish out to me and others.
Same with you. When you first came back on here, you were bullying in your manner, using emoticons to ridicule my posts, so I hit back at you and gave you a taste of what you dish out. You didn't like this, so you started complaining about it and accusing me of being 'personal', completely forgetting your own behaviour.
Bullies are always hypocrites.
I believe this guy over you and Bill, yes without a show of doubt
Professor Vanezis MB, ChB, DMJ(Path), MD, PhD, member of the Royal College of Pathologists and a Fellow of the college (FRCPath); member of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow and fellow (FRCP(Glasg.) and a Founding Fellow of the Faculty of Forensic Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians in (FFFLM)
He has been a practicing forensic pathologist since 1974, having conducted in excess of 2,000 suspicious death autopsies, of which approximately 1,500 were homicides, and has held a number of academic and service appointments up to the current day. He has also carried out autopsies abroad, at the request of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and in his capacity as Honorary Civilian Consultant to the Armed Forces, as well as on behalf of the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal. He has also been the supervising pathologist in a number of multiple death incidents including The Charing Cross Road Fire and The Kathmandu (Thai Airways) air crash.
He became an Officer of the Order of the British Empire awarded in the Queen’s Birthday Honours List June 2001, for Forensic Pathology Services in Kosovo.
He is also a member of a number of examining boards in forensic medicine and has served from time to time on college and medical school committees as well as carrying out academic research. This includes facial identification, forensic pathology, especially in relation timing of injuries and projects involving the next of kin of deceased persons reported to the coroner. He also teaches regularly to both undergraduates and postgraduate students and co-ordinates a number of postgraduate courses. He has also published widely in forensic medicine in peer reviewed journals has edited two books and contributed to a number of other textbooks. He also continues to have a professional interest as a forensic medical expert into the investigation of the death of Diana, Princess of Wales.
Professor Vanezis has appeared in a number of television programmes in relation to his work. He also gives interviews to radio programmes.
All of this is duly noted, but none of it means his work in the case under discussion was correct.
I accept that arguments from authority are not always fallacious. You can validly come on here and say, 'Such-and-such a man has expertise in this area and he says this-and-that and given his expertise and background, I am inclined to accept what he says'.
But I am not sure you can say that with complete confidence on this particular topic. We have our own access to the evidence and we have eyes to see, and it remains the case that even great experts in a field can get things wrong, even make basic and fundamental errors sometimes.
Also, I have visited his website a few times and I note he has been careful to omit mention of the Bamber case from his CV - a surprising omission, given that it was a mass murder case.
