The mystery of PV25 and PV26

[guest7363]

Read what I said. I know it is standard practice and I know he ordered them before he left to come to Chelmsford.
The anomalies centre around the missing necklace/choker and the level of fragmentation etc. I wrote it badly but if you want to nit pick so be it. I started with a single sentence as background for the less well versed forum members.

Oh gotta, your apologies accepted Bubo Bubo👍 The necklace is visible on the X-ray photos of Sheila by the way, which was taken on the 7th of August, this I suspect was handed to either Cook or Davidson, who should have entered this into CID6.

[guest29835]

I do not claim to be a ballistics expert by any means.  I do have experience of various types of firearm and where I have considered that my experience and knowledge may be of some assistance in relation to the case I have posted here.  If you look back a few years you will find a number of threads in which I have made posts in relation to firearms etc.  What is your knowledge of firearms/ballistics?

.

I wasn't questioning your ballistic knowledge.  That wasn't my point at all.  The question I actually asked doesn't appear to have been answered.

[guest29835]

It is accepted by many that when it comes to Ballistics NGB is amongst the most knowledgeable  non expert on the forum. My analysis has been checked by him via pm. I am sure he will be willing to let you know his response.
I also suggest that you do a search 'Major Mead' of postings by Mike T. He has serious misgivings about PV20 and Mead's findings. It is possible that I am the first to use ratios to prove the swap. If Mead was only given gram weights to check he would not have spotted it but he was given two different gram weights according to MT. It maybe that the only bullet we have both gram and grain weights is PV20 allowing a ratio analysis, since it came to MF via Taylor who examined for blood and tissue reasons and used a gram weight. Mike has thanked me for my contribution on PV20.
The information posted by mike merely states what he did. We have no documentation on the forum.
I do not know you and your relative ballistic knowledge. May I respectfully request you do more research before calling me out.

I wasn't 'calling you out'.