Author Topic: Bamber's 1989 COA  (Read 1325 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13783
Re: Bamber's 1989 COA
« Reply #15 on: May 30, 2021, 10:42:AM »

If anyone has any other information on this appeal, would be good to see it.

1989 Lord Lane C.J in the Court of Appeal

"The question of the silencer, quite apart from where it was found and how it got there in the cupboard, loomed very large first in the view of the Judge, certainly in the view of this Court and plainly in the view of the jury, because when they came back to ask a question it was a question directed to this very point".

"We need to hear blood expert's evidence regarding the blood in the silencer, (a) a perfect match of Sheila's blood, (b) what was the chance of the blood group being June and Ralph's mixing together"


"That of course was fatal, the jury accepted it"

"What is sometimes overlooked is that a direction to the jury reflects the sort of case with which the Judge was dealing. A strong prosecution case will inevitably result in what may be strong comments. Exactly the same with a strong defence case, that may justify strong comments."