Why Adam Trolls This Forum

[guest29835]

Appreciate it's a tough one for Adam because he has trolled as a guilter for so long that admitting a stance change would be difficult.  This is just to say that I will be around and I am happy to offer moral support to Adam and others via the PM system.

[Roch]

Don't steal Adam's thunder, Roch.  Adam is a bit touchy about all this because his soaps thread was a bit of flop, even though I did my best by encouraging Mike to join in and mention Emmerdale.

Sat through both of those tonight (EastEnders and Emmerdale).

[Adam]

Actually the 'time in the market beats trying to time the market' quote is not always true.

If you were able to get your money out within 24 hours last year, then you could have missed several weeks of the fall. Once Covid19 was news it was pretty obvious the markets were going to fall.

The markets do not like uncertainty. Lockdowns were not ideal but at least the markets then knew what was planned.

[lookout]

Which is why it's better to invest in gold ! You can at least choose your day/ time for its highest value.

[David1819]

Talking of Trolls. Steve has not signed in since I said he has never been in a serious relationship and lives vicariously through Colin. I think I may have hit the nail on the head and touched a nerve. 

[gringo]

Talking of Trolls. Steve has not signed in since I said he has never been in a serious relationship and lives vicariously through Colin. I think I may have hit the nail on the head and touched a nerve. 

  Quote from: David1819 on May 22, 2021, 11:06:PM
Steve hasn't logged in for a while (Thankfully)

As for Adam I have no idea why NGB let's him post here despite complains from half a dozen members over the last five years. You would think Adam has blackmailed him.

I have received many complaints about several members over the years, often coupled with demands that the member should be permanently banned.  As a last resort a permanent ban has been imposed but if we acceded to every such request we would have scarcely any members left.  It is a difficult balance to strike but we do try to moderate the forum with as light a touch as possible.

    This was a reply to you from NGB previously. If you read replies to your posts then you would have already known that Steve has been banned.

[David1819]

  Quote from: David1819 on May 22, 2021, 11:06:PM
Steve hasn't logged in for a while (Thankfully)

As for Adam I have no idea why NGB let's him post here despite complains from half a dozen members over the last five years. You would think Adam has blackmailed him.

I have received many complaints about several members over the years, often coupled with demands that the member should be permanently banned.  As a last resort a permanent ban has been imposed but if we acceded to every such request we would have scarcely any members left.  It is a difficult balance to strike but we do try to moderate the forum with as light a touch as possible.

    This was a reply to you from NGB previously. If you read replies to your posts then you would have already known that Steve has been banned.

Where does it state Steve has been banned? This is news to me. 

[David1819]

Where does it state Steve has been banned? This is news to me. 

Steve_uk has not been banned.

[Adam]

Appreciate it's a tough one for Adam because he has trolled as a guilter for so long that admitting a stance change would be difficult.  This is just to say that I will be around and I am happy to offer moral support to Adam and others via the PM system.

David has just had to show me his 2016 'forensic evidence breakthrough'.

[David1819]

Steve_uk has not been banned.

Moderator has confirmed Steve_uk was not banned. Gringo got my hopes up though 

[guest29835]

David has just had to show me his 2016 'forensic evidence breakthrough'.

It's one them for Adam.  He can't quite bring himself to change stance officially, so he's now posting with a pro-innocent stance but pretending to be a guilter.  Let me stress that I remain available through the PM system to any member, including Adam, who needs moral support before taking that brave step and 'coming out'.

We're with you Adam.

[Adam]

It's one them for Adam.  He can't quite bring himself to change stance officially, so he's now posting with a pro-innocent stance but pretending to be a guilter.  Let me stress that I remain available through the PM system to any member, including Adam, who needs moral support before taking that brave step and 'coming out'.

We're with you Adam.

Always thought the COA made up those 71 pieces.

[guest29835]

Always thought the COA made up those 71 pieces.

Thanks Adam.  It could be that the judges were fans of EastEnders and wanted to cover up for Peggy and Pat.

Do you think the truth will ever come out Adam?

[Adam]

Thanks Adam.  It could be that the judges were fans of EastEnders and wanted to cover up for Peggy and Pat.

Do you think the truth will ever come out Adam?

Maybe Pat used her good looks to sweet talk the judges.

[guest29835]

Maybe Pat used her good looks to sweet talk the judges.

This is new information.  It may be that Mike has a memo or secret letter somewhere in his archives.  It could be that one of the judges kept a diary and this could well blow the case wide open.

Another one for the CCRC.  Thanks Adam.