The Official Jeremy Bamber and White House Farm Podcast Series - Season 1

[Roch]

Ann Eaton has been wheeled out for the latest effort..

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ann-eaton-cousin-of-jeremy-bamber/id1555731881?i=1000522286974

[lookout]

Based on this podcast alone, Jeremy's conviction is a national disgrace. I can only hope that those concerned get their comeuppance in some way. This takes greed to the highest level you can reach.

[lookout]

30 rounds were fired that night !?

[David1819]

30 rounds were fired that night !?

25

[lookout]

25

30 according to the podcast, inclusive of new evidence.

[David1819]

30 according to the podcast, inclusive of new evidence.

Its wrong.

[Roch]

Its wrong.

I'm willing to consider it's wrong - if you can explain how they could have mistakenly calculated 30.

[David1819]

I'm willing to consider it's wrong - if you can explain how they could have mistakenly calculated 30.

Are the CT making these podcasts?

[lookout]

Remember when a shot was heard by a passer-by with his dog ?  Chances are Nevill might still have been finishing off harvesting because he went out to the fields after Jeremy left.

[lookout]

If you listen to the podcast at the beginning, the narrator says 30 was included in the new evidence----words to that effect, but all she says is documented.

[Roch]

Are the CT making these podcasts?

I doubt Ann Eaton has made it. Have you actually listened to the content? Before posting in defiance of the content, it might be an idea to at least listen to the content and the context in which it is delivered.

[lookout]

When you listen to these podcasts in their entirety it makes it far easier to slot things together, which do include snippets from their new submissions, even to the scraping of the paint from the Aga-----but " you didn't see that " ! 

[David1819]

I doubt Ann Eaton has made it. Have you actually listened to the content? Before posting in defiance of the content, it might be an idea to at least listen to the content and the context in which it is delivered.

The makers are "JB Campaign LTD" AKA the CT.

Even the description text is wrong. The Jury never asked if AE had motive to lie, only RWB.

[Roch]

The makers are "JB Campaign LTD" AKA the CT.

Yes, we know that. It's a series of podcasts every weds. They usually make reference to some of the grounds within the latest referral but some of the podcasts also contain speculation, presumably for entertainment and to provide a contrast to the plethora of other podcasts that have emerged since the drama.

[David1819]

Yes, we know that. It's a series of podcasts every weds. They usually make reference to some of the grounds within the latest referral but some of the podcasts also contain speculation, presumably for entertainment and to provide a contrast to the plethora of other podcasts that have emerged since the drama.

These podcasts are intended for the general public who know little about the case.

I have gone over about 15,000 pages of case related documents. All of them at least twice, and some documents I consider crucial I re-read over half a dozen times. There is not really much more I need to know.