BREAKING NEWS - SECRET BLOOD TESTS ON GUNS TRIGGER GUARD FOR BLOOD DEPOSITS !!!

[killingeve]

Explains all the crying on National TV. Not as cocky lately as in earlier interviews. Him and all the relatives who benefited from Jeremys conviction should be facing life sentences.

Bamber was found guilty in a court of law some 3 decades ago.  The motive accepted by the courts was greed and a desire to fast forward his inheritance.  It is against the law to benefit from the proceeds of crime.  Therfore his inheritance passed to the relatives.  On what basis do you they should be facing life sentences?

[mike tesko]

David Boutflour claimed that he had seen cuts on 'Jeremys' right hand and index finger, and he asked police to test the rifles trigger guard to see if there was a presence of his blood upon it. In contrast, Essex police have always maintained that there were no marks or blood on either her feet, and her hands..

But, look carefully at the index finger of 'Sheilas' right hand" and the top part of the same hand, to see that she had been handling the rifle, and had fired it - marks that were made 'by the trigger guard' of 'the rifle' ..

[lookout]

Bamber was found guilty in a court of law some 3 decades ago.  The motive accepted by the courts was greed and a desire to fast forward his inheritance.  It is against the law to benefit from the proceeds of crime.  Therfore his inheritance passed to the relatives.  On what basis do you they should be facing life sentences?

How easy a motive it was for people to say " he was greedy and did it for the money " What rubbish !
Though JB wasn't particularly clever, he was intelligent enough to realise that committing something such as murder would have voided any forthcoming inheritance.

The pic. of Sheila's hand tells us that it was either a defence mark or she'd been involved. Defence in that she'd picked up a rifle against her foe or she'd spent some time with the rifle that it caused the trigger to dig in with the pressure of holding and using the rifle.
If she'd been defending her children, as you would, then the attacker would be shot/ injured, no matter what the consequences. An animal protects its young.

Anyone with half an eye can see that there's been pressure put on Sheila's hand.
There were TWO rifles so if JB had been present at all he'd have been walloped with one of them if taken by surprise. Someone would have attempted out of the three adults !

[killingeve]

How easy a motive it was for people to say " he was greedy and did it for the money " What rubbish !
Though JB wasn't particularly clever, he was intelligent enough to realise that committing something such as murder would have voided any forthcoming inheritance.

The pic. of Sheila's hand tells us that it was either a defence mark or she'd been involved. Defence in that she'd picked up a rifle against her foe or she'd spent some time with the rifle that it caused the trigger to dig in with the pressure of holding and using the rifle.
If she'd been defending her children, as you would, then the attacker would be shot/ injured, no matter what the consequences. An animal protects its young.

Anyone with half an eye can see that there's been pressure put on Sheila's hand.
There were TWO rifles so if JB had been present at all he'd have been walloped with one of them if taken by surprise. Someone would have attempted out of the three adults !

It might be "rubbish" to you but the court at trial were obviously impressed by the motive given.

Those who claim Sheila had marks on her person that went unnoticed by the Home Office pathologist need to overcome the fact that the defence pathologist had access to all relevant material, including images, and the pair pretty much agreed on everything. 

[Rob_]

It might be "rubbish" to you but the court at trial were obviously impressed by the motive given.

Those who claim Sheila had marks on her person that went unnoticed by the Home Office pathologist need to overcome the fact that the defence pathologist had access to all relevant material, including images, and the pair pretty much agreed on everything.

The verdict was 10 to 2 so it was touch and go, so not sure how you can say "the court at trial were obviously impressed by the motive given"

I am confident a trial today with all the information now available would be not guilty.

[killingeve]

The verdict was 10 to 2 so it was touch and go, so not sure how you can say "the court at trial were obviously impressed by the motive given"

I am confident a trial today with all the information now available would be not guilty.

I can say with confidence the court at trial was obviously impressed by the motive since Bamber was found guilty on a majority verdict.  Furthermore despite the system allowing for appeals to date Bamber has been unsuccessful.

[Rob_]

I can say with confidence the court at trial was obviously impressed by the motive since Bamber was found guilty on a majority verdict.  Furthermore despite the system allowing for appeals to date Bamber has been unsuccessful.

You can believe whatever you want and so can I, but the 10 to 2 verdict will always be a thorn in the prosecutions case as there was obviously doubt in the jury.

[killingeve]

You can believe whatever you want and so can I, but the 10 to 2 verdict will always be a thorn in the prosecutions case as there was obviously doubt in the jury.

Such a thorn its stood the test of time for over 35 years.

[lookout]

Such a thorn its stood the test of time for over 35 years.

We'll see !!

[Rob_]

Such a thorn its stood the test of time for over 35 years.

Anyone who is fair and impartial can see what has gone on, as Lookout says "We'll see !!"

[killingeve]

Anyone who is fair and impartial can see what has gone on, as Lookout says "We'll see !!"

If this is so how come Bamber has so few people on side? 

Look at the recent Theroux documentary? 

If anything it gets worse eg former best friend Brett Collins remanined silent for decades but now he too believes Bamber is behind the killings and is quite vocal about it!

[killingeve]

We'll see !!

If you're relying on the recent submission I think you will be sorely disappointed.  And its not just my view, NGB1066 has given you his view on the chances of a referral to the appeal courts. 

[lookout]

If this is so how come Bamber has so few people on side? 

Look at the recent Theroux documentary? 

If anything it gets worse eg former best friend Brett Collins remanined silent for decades but now he too believes Bamber is behind the killings and is quite vocal about it!

Brett Collins refused an interview on TV, for which he could have been paid quite a packet for. I wonder why ? The same man wasn't backwards in coming forwards when he told JB the antique values of items within the farmhouse though ! 

[lookout]

If I didn't have such a suspicious mind I'd say that a few people have been handed sweeteners ( hush money ) to change tack and turn like snakes.
 Afterall, business at the farm would have brought in millions and whatever was " given away " would be offset in tax. What's a few grand between friends when keeping them onside ? It's worth it isn't it ?

Barbara Wilson, who at one time said she wished her own son was like Jeremy.
Brett Collins who'd threatened to go to the newspapers with a large heading " Jeremy didn't murder his family ".
Of course Julie Mugford was already paid off.

Honesty is no longer the best policy---it doesn't pay the bills !

[killingeve]

Brett Collins refused an interview on TV, for which he could have been paid quite a packet for. I wonder why ? The same man wasn't backwards in coming forwards when he told JB the antique values of items within the farmhouse though !

Where's the evidence Brett Collins was offered an interview on tv, for which he could have been paid quite a packet for?  You make a lot of statements but do not seem to have any supporting evidence to back them up with?

What has valuing antiques got to do with anything?