Why did David Boutflour introduce the false claim that Jeremy had got cuts on his hand that were said to have been made by the trigger guard of the anshuzt rifle? What did he know what only the police and the pathologist Peter Venezis knew? Why did David Boutflour wait until the 14th and the 16th September 1985 before introducing such a lie?
anyone who had allegedly fired that rifle a total of 25 times would almost certainly have got marks or small cuts on the hand / fingers that they activated the trigger with. It would be relatively easy to match such cuts or marks to the trigger guard had Jeremy been responsible for using the gun as alleged. But, he didn't have any such cuts, or marks on his hands or fingers. But the police had evidence that Sheila Caffell did in the form of a crime scene photograph, which they secreted away as part of 'The Senior Investigating Officers Album'which was kept locked away in ACC Peter Simpsons office safe with instruction that no-one could get access mto it without permission from him...
Here is a copy of that particular crime scene photograph, showing a series of cuts and marks on her index finger and the top part of her right hand in the region between thumb and index finger. The police had this evidence which was sufficient for them to be sure that Sheila had handled and fired that rifle. But they hid it away, and instead opted for David Boutflour to make the false claim that Jeremy had got such cuts and marks on his hands on the very morning of the shootings...
Sheila had the cuts and marks on her right hand and index finger (as photographed at the scene with her body insitu, versus the false claim introduced in witness statements made by David Boutflour, dated 14th September and 16th September 1985 that Jeremy had got the very same cuts and marks caused by rapid/repeat use of the trigger mechanism of the gun, in particular, by coming into direct contact with the guns trigger guard...
