The Silenced Rifle Did Not Fit Inside The Gun Cupboard

[lookout]

I'd calm down if I were you QC ! You're behaving like a spoiled brat !

[guest29835]

I'd calm down if I were you QC ! You're behaving kike a spoiled brat !

Stockholm Syndrome.

I'm rather concerned that you were once a mental health nurse, the way you abuse people.  Perhaps that explained why you're as thick as thieves with him.

The fact is that Steve is the one provoking me, and he lies.

[lookout]

Stockholm Syndrome.

I'm rather concerned that you were once a mental health nurse, the way you abuse people.  Perhaps that explained why you're as thick as thieves with him.

The fact is that Steve is the one provoking me, and he lies.

I've known Steve a lot longer than I've known yourself so naturally I'm going to support him. Your " thick as thieves " is quite an exaggeration, I'd have called it friendly banter over these past 8 years or so. I can't say that I've been as " thick as thieves " with anyone here whether it be in the guilty or innocent camp.

You don't need to be concerned that I was once a mental health nurse, though I can invariably spot a crackpot when I see one ! Me abuse people ?  When ? You're going to have to back that one up !
On the contrary, it's you who's had a go at nearly everyone here since you arrived on the forum, strewth !

It's you who has the problem, sort yourself out !

[guest29835]

I've known Steve a lot longer than I've known yourself so naturally I'm going to support him. Your " thick as thieves " is quite an exaggeration, I'd have called it friendly banter over these past 8 years or so. I can't say that I've been as " thick as thieves " with anyone here whether it be in the guilty or innocent camp.

You don't need to be concerned that I was once a mental health nurse, though I can invariably spot a crackpot when I see one ! Me abuse people ?  When ? You're going to have to back that one up !
On the contrary, it's you who's had a go at nearly everyone here since you arrived on the forum, strewth !

It's you who has the problem, sort yourself out !

1. If somebody lies about me, I won't stand for it.  You may put up with it, because you lack self-respect, but I won't stand for it for one moment.  That does not mean there is anything wrong with me.  Quite the opposite. 

2. Pointing out lies is necessary.  I would rather be banned from here and preserve my integrity.  Steve is a liar and he is vile - and I am not the only one to make similar observations about him.  Perhaps you think JackieD and NG1066 have something wrong with them too?  Why don't you send one of your condescending posts to them?

3. As a mental health nurse, you are not qualified to diagnose people, still less offer such opinions on the internet.  You are not an expert on mental health in any sense.  You are a nurse, therefore not qualified to offer such opinions  You should know that, and you should know that it is abusive and wrong to do so.  I, again, point out that the fact you were a mental health nurse is rather concerning, in view of your own attitude and behaviour.

4. I have read your posting history, and judging by it, if either of us is a crackpot, it's surely more likely to be yourself.

5. Don't tell me what to do.

[lookout]

1. If somebody lies about me, I won't stand for it.  You may put up with it, because you lack self-respect, but I won't stand for it for one moment.  That does not mean there is anything wrong with me.  Quite the opposite. 

2. Pointing out lies is necessary.  I would rather be banned from here and preserve my integrity.  Steve is a liar and he is vile - and I am not the only one to make similar observations about him.  Perhaps you think JackieD and NG1066 have something wrong with them too?  Why don't you send one of your condescending posts to them?

3. As a mental health nurse, you are not qualified to diagnose people, still less offer such opinions on the internet.  You are not an expert on mental health in any sense.  You are a nurse, therefore not qualified to offer such opinions  You should know that, and you should know that it is abusive and wrong to do so.  I, again, point out that the fact you were a mental health nurse is rather concerning, in view of your own attitude and behaviour.

4. I have read your posting history, and judging by it, if either of us is a crackpot, it's surely more likely to be yourself.

5. Don't tell me what to do.

I don't have to prove myself to anyone, least of all Jackie or NGB as both know me over the years and have never given cause for any doubts about who I am and what I stand for.
You obviously jump to too many conclusions about people in general so I'd question your own " history " before picking holes in everyone else's.

You're touchy for no reason. Why ?        Has it all got to be about you ??

[guest29835]

I don't have to prove myself to anyone, least of all Jackie or NGB as both know me over the years and have never given cause for any doubts about who I am and what I stand for.
You obviously jump to too many conclusions about people in general so I'd question your own " history " before picking holes in everyone else's.

You're touchy for no reason. Why ?        Has it all got to be about you ??

I'm not asking you to prove yourself.  You've already proved it by telling us you're a mental health nurse.
I simply observe that by offering opinions about other people's mental health (which you've tried before with other people on here when they cross you), you are talking outside your own qualifications and expertise.  I think it's high time somebody pulled you up about it.

I'm also reminding you that before you go round lecturing to other people about how they post, you should perhaps remember your own posting record on here and your past behaviour.

The part in bold from your post is not true.  I clearly have a reason for my dispute with Steve.  I don't understand why you've stuck your nose in, other than perhaps that you're suffering from Stockholm Syndrome and have developed a soft spot for Steve as a result of the way he has abused and insulted you in the past (a psychiatric opinion of my own).  In any event, since your comment is based on an untrue premise, I need not reply further.  You're just talking rubbish.

[lookout]

I'm not asking you to prove yourself.  You've already proved it by telling us you're a mental health nurse.
I simply observe that by offering opinions about other people's mental health (which you've tried before with other people on here when they cross you), you are talking outside your own qualifications and expertise.  I think it's high time somebody pulled you up about it.

I'm also reminding you that before you go round lecturing to other people about how they post, you should perhaps remember your own posting record on here and your past behaviour.

The part in bold from your post is not true.  I clearly have a reason for my dispute with Steve.  I don't understand why you've stuck your nose in, other than perhaps that you're suffering from Stockholm Syndrome and have developed a soft spot for Steve as a result of the way he has abused and insulted you in the past (a psychiatric opinion of my own).  In any event, since your comment is based on an untrue premise, I need not reply further.  You're just talking rubbish.

You had a go at Real Justice. Was he telling lies as well ?  You're incorrigible !

   

[guest29835]

You had a go at Real Justice. Was he telling lies as well ?  You're incorrigible !

   

I'm disappointed with this anti-climactic response.  I was expecting you to offer another diagnosis. 

You have become quite the Miss Freud on this Forum, offering your unsolicited views on the state of other people’s mental health.  I’m the first person to challenge your bone fides in the field and I appreciate you’re not going to like it.

I have accused two people of lying on this Forum, and in both cases, they were lying.  That's why I called them liars, because they were lying.  It's not that hard.  Oh, and both of them attacked me first.

I 'had a go' at Real Justice because he was goading me. Why do you only recognise half the story? 

I see you apply that same biased approach to legal cases too.  Jeremy must be innocent, because you say so.  You shut your eyes and close your ears when the prosecution speak, so no wonder.

[JackieD]

I'd calm down if I were you QC ! You're behaving like a spoiled brat !

He’s not Lookout

Jeremy is not a predator and he is continually rude even to Ngb

[Steve_uk]

I'm not going to be the one blamed if he decides to leave the Forum, as he threatened previously. You enjoy his posts Jackie: praise indeed.

[JackieD]

You had a go at Real Justice. Was he telling lies as well ?  You're incorrigible !

   

Lookout you need to realise Steve and Real Justice are here for personal reasons
Ages ago Real Justice sent me a pm trying to get me on the guilty side and telling me his personal connections to the family

I make my own mind up

I am here for a reason and I am not here to be friends with anyone although I do have a high regard for some people here

I have seen the continued attacks on QC because he is questioning Jeremys guilt
It’s absolutely disgusting. He has spent hours researching this case and his input has been brilliant and good for him getting back at all the bullies. He wipe the floor with them

[JackieD]

I'm not going to be the one blamed if he decides to leave the Forum, as he threatened previously. You enjoy his posts Jackie: praise indeed.

You have no idea who he is though do you

And I will continue with 100% support

[lookout]

I'm not going to be the one blamed if he decides to leave the Forum, as he threatened previously. You enjoy his posts Jackie: praise indeed.

Steve if he leaves the forum it'll be under his own steam though he's the type to blame someone-----that's the way he operates. It's always got to be someone else. Doubtless he'll blame me, but it's water off a duck's back.

[Jane]

Steve if he leaves the forum it'll be under his own steam though he's the type to blame someone-----that's the way he operates. It's always got to be someone else. Doubtless he'll blame me, but it's water off a duck's back.

I think you may have to take up that position in a whole line of us, Lookout. I can think of at least six he's offended/harangued/bullied/abused/threatened, blaming them for attacking him first. I believe, as you say, such may be his wont.

[lookout]

I think you may have to take up that position in a whole line of us, Lookout. I can think of at least six he's offended/harangued/bullied/abused/threatened, blaming them for attacking him first. I believe, as you say, such may be his wont.

Indeed Jane, it doesn't make for a pleasant forum.