Lest We Forget...................

[lookout]

I wouldn’t want it any different my friend 👍. You are a pleasure to debate with and I love your humour 👍

Aw, thankyou for those few kind words RJ x

[JackieD]

I think the 'how' and 'when' can be proved.  The 'who' is more a matter of probability.  The question of who discovered these scratch marks and/or what initiated the closer examination of the aga surround is a whole topic in its own right as there are inconsistencies in the accounts between Ann Eaton, Stan Jones and Ron Cook. 

I would rule out Cook as a suspect.

I hope this can be proved anyone responsible prosecuted

[Jane]

B.O.L.L.O.C.K.S.

You're an Aunt Sally.  You know nothing about the law and the legal process and your posts are mostly content-free.  You've spent years on this Forum and the other one attacking people haughtily.  You're sad and weird.

It reminds me of a programme from a few years back. Might it be "V For Vengeance"? in which 'humans' burst out of their skins to reveal the hostile and venemous interiors lurking beneath the surface.

It's of no relevance HOW long I've spent on this forum. As for "the other one", I have NEVER seen any discord between posters. It's not permitted. I can only think it's one you were banned from because you didn't obey the rules. I don't attack unless I'm attacked first. Why do I get the feeling that you're looking to attack because you enjoy it?

Of course, this may all be your way of covering up that you STILL, after having been asked three or four times, haven't provided incidences of the "deodorizing of Julie and Colin" which you accuse Jeremy's detractors of?

[guest29835]

I hope this can be proved anyone responsible prosecuted

The only one of the three alive now is Ann Eaton and she's probably in her 70s.  Even if there is something in what I say, prosecution is unlikely.  To be honest, this case is academic now.  Jeremy is touching 60.  They could release him tomorrow and he's still lost his life.  It's all over now anyway.  These questions should have been asked 35 years ago.

[guest29835]

It reminds me of a programme from a few years back. Might it be "V For Vengeance"? in which 'humans' burst out of their skins to reveal the hostile and venemous interiors lurking beneath the surface.

It's of no relevance HOW long I've spent on this forum. As for "the other one", I have NEVER seen any discord between posters. It's not permitted. I can only think it's one you were banned from because you didn't obey the rules. I don't attack unless I'm attacked first. Why do I get the feeling that you're looking to attack because you enjoy it?

Of course, this may all be your way of covering up that you STILL, after having been asked three or four times, haven't provided incidences of the "deodorizing of Julie and Colin" which you accuse Jeremy's detractors of?

Of course, we all need my answer to that.  Even Jeremy is on tenterhooks in Wakefield.

You're weird.

[Jane]

To be honest Lookout, the paint on the silencer could have happened pre murders, it was used mainly to bolster the blood on the silencer, the defence could have and should have argued this case?  In a nutshell it was used as a secondary piece of evidence.  Now if the defence could prove the paint was deliberate and after the murders, which I think they tried in an appeal, this could have been damaging for the prosecution?

I've truthfully not given it much thought recently, but I'm inclined to think it was an old 'injury' to the paintwork being used to advantage. I think Lookout said something about the paintwork being recent. If it was still soft, how could it have flaked? It's actually bought back memories of what I used to do as a child!!! After my Pa had painted something, say a window, at just the right degree of dryness, and somewhere it couldn't easily be detected, I could gouge it a little with my nails.

[Roch]

The only one of the three alive now is Ann Eaton and she's probably in her 70s.  Even if there is something in what I say, prosecution is unlikely.  To be honest, this case is academic now.  Jeremy is touching 60.  They could release him tomorrow and he's still lost his life.  It's all over now anyway.  These questions should have been asked 35 years ago.

I didn't know Ron Cook had passed.

[guest7363]

I didn't know Ron Cook had passed.

I think QC means family Roch?

[guest29835]

I think QC means family Roch?

I am open to correction, but I believe both Stan and Ron have now passed on.  The only survivor of the three is Ann, and as I say, I expect she will now be elderly (no disrespect meant).

[Jane]

I am open to correction, but I believe both Stan and Ron have now passed on.  The only survivor of the three is Ann, and as I say, I expect she will now be elderly (no disrespect meant).

Mid 70s

[guest29835]

Mid 70s

Even if what I say is correct, I wouldn't be enthusiastic about prosecuting somebody in their 70s.  Sorry.

[Roch]

I think QC means family Roch?

Sounds like Cooky's pegged it. He was a bit of an expert in this case wasn't he?  He was on the ITV docu about eight years ago.

[lookout]

Most of them have fallen off their perch's-----while waiting for JB to have a massive coronary probably.

[JackieD]

Most of them have fallen off their perch's-----while waiting for JB to have a massive coronary probably.

That definitely was a laugh out loud moment Lookout 

[Caroline]

I am open to correction, but I believe both Stan and Ron have now passed on.  The only survivor of the three is Ann, and as I say, I expect she will now be elderly (no disrespect meant).

Ron is very much alive.