The reporters you mention have appeared on several documentaries and explained it.
Steel loses its strength under heat. Hence all the towers collapsed after the fires spread uncontrollably for a period of time.
In a typical fire scenario (Where the fire starts from within) these buildings are designed to starve the fire of oxygen. In this case all buildings had huge holes in them thus feeding the fires oxygen and all water suppression systems were cut off from plane impact and in WTC7s case the collapse of the towers.
Risible explanations that fail to address the obvious anomalies that require explanation.
How did all of the supports fail simultaneously in order for free fall to take place? It is agreed by all that there was a simultaneous failure of independent steel supports.
That you choose to believe that independent steel beams can simultaneously fail, whilst also believing that newsreaders who reported this event more than 20 minutes before it occurred made a simple mistake that requires no more explanation than calling it an error is your prerogative.
That you also support NATO/US/UK etc. aggression wherever it occurs demonstrates that you are wedded to your position through dogma rather than reason.
