Jeremy spoke from prison saying, I quote, " The fight will continue and my substantial and compelling submissions will be made to the CCRC as soon as possible. We know that ultimately, disclosure of the material or not, we will win and I will be freed ", unquote.
So going by this he appears up-beat and confident, though we don't know how long all this is going to take, from submissions------------
Optimism has been present during a lot of the last 35 years. They have to break the cycle that the authorities have in place:
They rely upon the public, legal and other professionals, to take-for-granted that the sound moderator evidence is both
genuine and 'compelling'.
They portray partial disclosure as being compliant with requests for disclosure.
They dismiss attempts to obtain further disclosure, by claiming that it would not diminish the original, compelling sound moderator evidence.
They point towards appeals and enquiries having sustained the safety of the convictions.
This model is working for them very well. This cycle will continue over and over, until the right voices, coherently explain in the simple terms, why the original sound moderator evidence is
not genuine.
Also - why is the crown paying for a good QC to prevent disclosure, for paperwork that the Crown believes cannot impact on the safety of the convictions? This makes no sense. This needs to be pointed out to people.
